The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A pathway of targeted autophagy is induced by DNA damage in budding yeast
Abstract
Significance: The DNA damage response (DDR) is a well-orchestrated and tightly regulated process. The DDR pathway does not act in isolation; indeed, evidence of cross-talk between the DDR and numerous signaling pathways affecting cytoskeletal integrity, nutrient sensing, and autophagy has been demonstrated. In this paper, we report that the DDR induces a distinct pathway of autophagy: genotoxin-induced targeted autophagy (GTA). GTA requires the action of the checkpoint kinases Mec1/ATR, Tel1/ATM, and Rad53/CHEK2. Rad53 mediates the transcriptional up-regulation of autophagy genes via negative regulation of the repressor Rph1/KDM4. GTA requires components of the selective autophagy machinery and is distinct from canonical autophagy pathways. A genome-wide screen for GTA modulators identifies genes required for genotoxin-induced autophagy and starvation-induced autophagy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although under normal conditions almost 99% of the lipofuscin particles are located in autophagosomes or lysosomes”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [1093]
In the citing paper
“an impairment of autophagy leads to free lipofuscin in the cytosol [1093,1094]”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [1093]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
Klionsky, D. J., Abdalla, F. C., Abeliovich, H., Abraham, R. T., Acevedo-Arozena, A., Adeli, K., Agholme, L., Agnello, M., Agostinis, P., Aguirre-Ghiso, J. A., et al. (2012) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.19496 · Cited by 3,996 · cited 2×
“To monitor autophagy after DNA damage, we used the wellestablished GFP-Atg8 processing assay (25, 26).”
MethodSelf-citationSystematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants
Tong, A. H. Y., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D., Pagé, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C. W. V., Bussey, H., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065810 · Cited by 2,138
DRAM, a p53-Induced Modulator of Autophagy, Is Critical for Apoptosis
Crighton, D., Wilkinson, S., O'Prey, J., Syed, N., Smith, P., Harrison, P. R., Gasco, M., Garrone, O., Crook, T., & Ryan, K. M. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.034 · Cited by 1,380
Regulation of autophagy by cytoplasmic p53
Tasdemir, E., Maiuri, M. C., Galluzzi, L., Vitale, I., Djavaheri-Mergny, M., D'Amelio, M., Criollo, A., Morselli, E., Zhu, C., Harper, F., et al. (2008) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1730 · Cited by 1,132
Schuldiner, M., Collins, S. R., Thompson, N. J., Denic, V., Bhamidipati, A., Punna, T., Ihmels, J., Andrews, B., Boone, C., Greenblatt, J. F., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.031 · Cited by 870
Self-citationControl of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms
Sanchez, Y., Bachant, J., Wang, H., Hu, F., Liu, D., Tetzlaff, M., & Elledge, S. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5442.1166 · Cited by 536
Mitophagy in Yeast Occurs through a Selective Mechanism
Kanki, T., & Klionsky, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m802403200 · Cited by 335
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.051206.105231 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.281.5374.272 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M306783200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1140321 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gad.212282.112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0701622104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1602827113 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.112.149013 · DOI
- 10.1038/cdd.2012.73 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1507 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.01344-09 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e04-11-1035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1218065109 · DOI
- 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-10-0473 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.23280 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms7823 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb1192 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0913860107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncb0608-637 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.3678 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M404399200 · DOI
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a016428 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81482-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-G · DOI
- 10.1002/yea.2967 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.06.015 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1200313109 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e07-12-1292 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.048 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.049 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.19.11.7630 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/30.3.643 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2012.151 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14506 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncb1723 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1091/mbc.11.7.2445 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.054 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03203-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.02.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0903316106 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M400272200 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.04.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.1234 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature00935 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1083/jcb.201301120 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1000063107 · DOI
- 10.1038/351158a0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa0769 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0703252104 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.20681 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/cr.2013.153 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-61779-276-2_8 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.16.5.2164 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00177-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncb2480 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citationAutophagy role(s) in response to oncogenes and DNA replication stress
Vanzo, R., Bartkova, J., Merchut-Maya, J. M., Hall, A., Bouchal, J., Dyrskjøt, L., Frankel, L. B., Gorgoulis, V., Maya-Mendoza, A., Jäättelä, M., et al. (2020) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/s41418-019-0403-9 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Eapen, V. V., Waterman, D. P., Bernard, A., Schiffmann, N., Sayas, E., Kamber, R., Lemos, B., Memisoglu, G., Ang, J., Mazella, A., Chuartzman, S. G., Loewith, R. J., Schuldiner, M., Denic, V., Klionsky, D. J., & Haber, J. E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454;
- Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Sciences, Rehovot, Israel 7610001;
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland;
- Molecular and Cell Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-02-02
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
- Funders
- HHS | National Institutes of Health (GM61766, GM053396, T32 GM007122)
- HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM20056)
- United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (2013101)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review