The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from corn–soybean croplands
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Prairie strips are a new conservation technology designed to alleviate biodiversity loss and environmental damage associated with row-crop agriculture. Results from a multiyear, catchment-scale experiment comparing corn and soybean fields with and without prairie vegetation indicated prairie strips raised pollinator and bird abundance, decreased water runoff, and increased soil and nutrient retention. These benefits accrued at levels disproportionately greater than the land area occupied by prairie strips. Social surveys revealed demand among both farm and nonfarm populations for the outcomes prairie strips produced. We estimated prairie strips could be used to improve biodiversity and ecosystem services across 3.9 million ha of cropland in Iowa and a large portion of the 69 million ha under similar management in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 · Cited by 7,692
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · Cited by 6,458
NbClust : An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v061.i06 · Cited by 3,396
Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage
Lange, M., Eisenhauer, N., Sierra, C. A., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Griffiths, R. I., Mellado-Vázquez, P. G., Malik, A. A., Roy, J., Scheu, S., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7707 · Cited by 1,742
Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops – A meta-analysis
Poeplau, C., & Don, A. (2015) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024 · Cited by 1,651
Shcherbak, I., Millar, N., & Robertson, G. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1322434111 · Cited by 1,204
Kremen, C., & Miles, A. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05035-170440 · Cited by 1,126
Alexander, R. B., Smith, R. A., Schwarz, G. E., Boyer, E. W., Nolan, J. V., & Brakebill, J. W. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0716103 · Cited by 889
Cited by
Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people
Kremen, C., & Merenlender, A. M. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau6020 · Cited by 1,125
Digital agriculture to design sustainable agricultural systems
Basso, B., & Antle, J. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0510-0 · Cited by 669
Ecological Intensification: Bridging the Gap between Science and Practice
Kleijn, D., Bommarco, R., Fijen, T. P. M., Garibaldi, L. A., Potts, S. G., & van der Putten, W. H. (2019) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002 · Cited by 548
Redefining marginal land for bioenergy crop production
Khanna, M., Chen, L., Basso, B., Cai, X., Field, J. L., Guan, K., Jiang, C., Lark, T. J., Richard, T. L., Spawn‐Lee, S. A., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12877 · Cited by 105
“…“hotspots” where unfavorable underlying biophysical characteristics (e.g., slope, coarse soil texture, proximity to waterways) lead to disproportionate impact (Saha et al., 2017), and opportunities for changing land use to increase environmental benefits (Cheng et al. 2020; Schulte et al., 2017).”
BackgroundGelfand, I., Hamilton, S. K., Kravchenko, A. N., Jackson, R. D., Thelen, K. D., & Robertson, G. P. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b07019 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulte, L. A., Niemi, J., Helmers, M. J., Liebman, M., Arbuckle, J. G., James, D. E., Kolka, R. K., O’Neal, M. E., Tomer, M. D., Tyndall, J. C., Asbjornsen, H., Drobney, P., Neal, J., Van Ryswyk, G., & Witte, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-10-02
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 11247-11252
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2762511975
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from corn–soybean croplands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1620229114
- The paper
- Schulte, L. A., Niemi, J., Helmers, M. J., Liebman, M., Arbuckle, J. G., James, D. E., Kolka, R. K., O’Neal, M. E., Tomer, M. D., Tyndall, J. C., Asbjornsen, H., Drobney, P., Neal, J., Van Ryswyk, G., & Witte, C. (2017). Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from corn–soybean croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620229114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
