Cited by 214Evolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geophysical Studies

Plate tectonic regulation of global marine animal diversity

Open access
Zaffos, Andrew, Finnegan, Seth, Peters, Shanan E.·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Understanding the processes that govern biodiversity is a central goal of biology. It has been hypothesized that global biodiversity is influenced by tectonically driven shifts in the arrangement of continental crust. We use globally distributed fossil data and quantitative analyses of shifting continental configurations in paleogeographic reconstructions to test this hypothesis. A significant component of the trajectory of marine animal diversity over the past 443 million years is attributable to the assembly and disassembly of the supercontinent Pangaea.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1702297114

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zaffos et al. (2017) confirmed the view of Valentine and Moores (1972) that plate tectonics regulate biodiversity.

    “Using the same line of evidence, Zaffos et al. (2017) confirmed the view of Valentine and Moores (1972) that plate tectonics regulate biodiversity, by using global databases to test an old model developed half a century ago.”

    From No (Cambrian) explosion and no (Ordovician) event: A single long-term radiation in the early Palaeozoic (2023) · cites this paper as Zaffos et al. (2017)

    The main text (page unavailable) says Zaffos et al. tested the plate-tectonic regulation hypothesis using a global marine fossil database and a paleogeographic model; the Discussion calls the results compelling evidence for a tectonic influence on long-term biodiversity. However, the paper attributes the hypothesis specifically to Valentine and Moores (1970), not their 1972 work, and notes that it is difficult to identify a specific causal mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Zaffos et al. (2017) observed a positive correlation between global biodiversity and continental fragmentation, indicating that, at least for the Mesozoic breakup of Pangaea, continental fragmentation exerted a first-order control on the long-term trajectory of Phanerozoic marine animal diversity.

    “Zaffos et al. (2017) observed a positive correlation between global biodiversity and continental fragmentation, indicating that, at least for the Mesozoic breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea, the continental fragmentation has exerted a first-order control on the long-term trajectory of Phanerozoic marine animal diversity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hallam A (1981) Relative importance of plate movements, eustasy and climate in con- trolling major biogeographical changes since the Early Mesozoic. Vicariance Biogeog- raphy: A Critique (Columbia Univ Press, New York), pp 303-330.
  2. Alroy J (2010) Fair sampling of taxonomic richness and unbiased estimation of orig- ination and extinction rates. Quantitative Methods in Paleobiology, Paleontological Society Papers (Paleontol Soc, Bethesda, MD), Vol 16, pp 55-80.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zaffos, A., Finnegan, S., & Peters, S. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Zaffos, Andrew
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-05-15
Volume
114
Issue
22
Pages
5653-5658
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2615085513
Cited by
214
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (EAR 1150082)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
Keywords
plate tectonics, continental breakup, marine biodiversity, Phanerozoic, supercontinent cycles, supercontinent breakup, Pangaea breakup, paleogeographic reconstruction, fossil record bias, Mesozoic
MeSH terms
Animals, Fossils, Geography, Marine Biology, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Geological Phenomena, Aquatic Organisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review