Cited by 48Mathematical Biology Tumor GrowthVirus-based gene therapy researchImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Evaluating optimal therapy robustness by virtual expansion of a sample population, with a case study in cancer immunotherapy

Open access
Barish, Syndi, Ochs, Michael F., Sontag, Eduardo D., Gevertz, Jana L.·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: A successful cancer therapy induces a strong antitumor response while causing minimal side effects. The heterogeneous nature of cancer observed across different regions of the primary tumor, across metastatic sites, across time, and across patients makes designing such a successful therapy challenging. Both standard of care and finely tailored treatment protocols run the risk of not exhibiting a robust antitumor response in the face of these uncertainties. Here we introduce a platform for exploring this robustness question using treatment response data from a sample population. Our method integrates these experimental data with statistical and mathematical techniques, allowing us to quantify therapeutic robustness. Using this approach, we identified a robust therapeutic protocol that combines oncolytic viruses with an immunotherapeutic vaccine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1703355114

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some statistical models allow for the prediction of optimal therapy parameters by using time-course experimental data and statistical analyses for identifying robust and optimal treatment protocols.

    “In addition, some statistical models allow for the prediction of optimal therapy parameters by using time-course experimental data and statistical analyses for identifying robust and optimal treatment protocols (see ref.97 for a proof of concept).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]Varma A, Morbidelli M, Wu H. Parameter Sensitivity in Chemical Systems. Cambridge Univ Press; New York: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. [37]Schättler H, Ledzewicz U. Optimal Control for Mathematical Models of Cancer: An Application of Geometric Methods. Springer; New York: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. [58]Feldman J, Goldwasser R, Mark S, Schwartz J, Orion I. A mathematical model for tumor volume evaluation using two-dimensions. J Appl Quant Methods. 2009;4:455–462. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barish, S., Ochs, M. F., Sontag, E. D., & Gevertz, J. L.
Affiliations
  • The College of New Jersey (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-07-17
Volume
114
Issue
31
Pages
E6277-E6286
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2734520279
Cited by
48
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (R01 LM011000, 1R01GM100473)
  • DOD | USAF | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-14-1-0060)
  • DOD | United States Navy | Office of Naval Research (N00014-13-1-0074)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
cancer immunotherapy, oncolytic viruses, cancer vaccines, treatment response heterogeneity, antitumor immunity, tumor heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Computer Simulation, Dendritic Cells, Disease Models, Animal, Immunotherapy, Melanoma, Models, Theoretical, T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic, Cancer Vaccines, Oncolytic Virotherapy, Oncolytic Viruses, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review