The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Musical training is a good thing, but does it benefit us in hearing speech in noise as has been suggested? If so, what is the brain mechanism behind this? Here we provide evidence of musician advantage on speech in noise perception at not only the behavioral level but also the level of neural representations of phonemes and functional connectivity. Results implicate better speech encoding in both auditory and speech motor regions, as well as stronger cross-modal auditory–motor integration in musicians than nonmusicians when processing speech, especially in noisy conditions. The idea that musical training improves speech in noise perception by enhancing auditory–motor integration is intriguing, with applications in alleviating speech perception difficulties in aging populations and hearing disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data.
Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1635 · Cited by 3,686 · cited 2×
“This was done by intersecting a metaanalytic mask on Neurosynth (43) (search term: speech) with the Freesurfer mask defined in Montreal Neurological Institute space.”
MethodAutomatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature
Destrieux, C., Fischl, B., Dale, A., & Halgren, E. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010 · Cited by 2,956
McLaren, D. G., Ries, M. L., Xu, G., & Johnson, S. C. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.068 · Cited by 1,445
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Why would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis
Patel, A. D. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142 · Cited by 703
Auditory-motor interaction revealed by fMRI: speech, music, and working memory in area Spt
Hickok, G., Buchsbaum, B., Humphries, C., & Muftuler, T. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903322307393 · Cited by 700
Cited by
Proactive Sensing of Periodic and Aperiodic Auditory Patterns
Rimmele, J. M., Morillon, B., Poeppel, D., & Arnal, L. H. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.003 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Du, Y., & Zatorre, R. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2017-12-04
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 13579-13584
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2774929676
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1712223114
- The paper
- Du, Y., & Zatorre, R. J. (2017). Musical training sharpens and bonds ears and tongue to hear speech better. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712223114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
