Cited by 700Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeuroscience and Music PerceptionPhonetics and Phonology Research

Auditory-motor interaction revealed by fMRI: speech, music, and working memory in area Spt

Hickok, Gregory, Buchsbaum, Bradley, Humphries, Colin, Muftuler, Tugan·2003·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The concept of auditory-motor interaction pervades speech science research, yet the cortical systems supporting this interface have not been elucidated. Drawing on experimental designs used in recent work in sensory-motor integration in the cortical visual system, we used fMRI in an effort to identify human auditory regions with both sensory and motor response properties, analogous to single-unit responses in known visuomotor integration areas. The sensory phase of the task involved listening to speech (nonsense sentences) or music (novel piano melodies); the "motor" phase of the task involved covert rehearsal/humming of the auditory stimuli. A small set of areas in the superior temporal and temporal-parietal cortex responded both during the listening phase and the rehearsal/humming phase. A left lateralized region in the posterior Sylvian fissure at the parietal-temporal boundary, area Spt, showed particularly robust responses to both phases of the task. Frontal areas also showed combined auditory + rehearsal responsivity consistent with the claim that the posterior activations are part of a larger auditory-motor integration circuit. We hypothesize that this circuit plays an important role in speech development as part of the network that enables acoustic-phonetic input to guide the acquisition of language-specific articulatory-phonetic gestures; this circuit may play a role in analogous musical abilities. In the adult, this system continues to support aspects of speech production, and, we suggest, supports verbal working memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892903322307393

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The practice of functionally defining a region of interest that is commonly activated by auditory inputs and covert articulation might artificially merge distinct auditory and motor regions in the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the sylvian fissure particularly when data are smoothed and averaged over subjects.

    “For example, the practice of functionally defining a region of interest that is commonly activated by auditory inputs and covert articulation (Hickok et al., 2003) might artificially merge distinct auditory and motor regions in the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the sylvian fissure particularly when data are smoothed and averaged over subjects.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hickok, G., Buchsbaum, B., Humphries, C., & Muftuler, T.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
673-682
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2130876672
Cited by
700
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 45
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC03681, R01DC003681)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
auditory-motor interaction, sensorimotor integration, superior temporal cortex, speech perception, music perception, working memory, speech production, speech development, articulatory gestures, frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Perception, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Motor Activity, Music, Pitch Discrimination, Practice, Psychological, Speech, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review