The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reforestation can sequester two petagrams of carbon in US topsoils in a century
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Forestland in the United States is a carbon (C) sink, offsetting ∼10% of annual greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change. Most of the C in forests is held in soils, and the capacity of forest soils to sequester C makes them a major component of the US forest C sink. Where reforestation is presently occurring, either through deliberate replanting after forestland is disturbed (e.g., burned), or where previously nonforested lands (e.g., cultivated) are converting to forestland, topsoils are accumulating C. However, these C accumulation rates are poorly constrained; quantifying them with empirical data are critical to accurately represent the role of reforestation in the US C budget and forecast the longevity of the US forest C sink.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Forests can be restored on marginal land for either protection/conservation or industrial purposes that supply timber and raw materials for wood products (4, 11, 12) or bioenergy (5–8).”
From Climate-smart forestry through innovative wood products and commercial afforestation and reforestation on marginal land (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SOIL ORGANIC CARBON AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATE AND VEGETATION
Jobbagy, E. G., & Jackson, R. B. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:tvdoso]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,607
Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis
Guo, L. B., & Gifford, R. M. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x · Cited by 3,972
Griscom, B. W., Adams, J., Ellis, P. W., Houghton, R. A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D. A., Schlesinger, W. H., Shoch, D., Siikamäki, J. V., Smith, P., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1710465114 · Cited by 3,481
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
(2015) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0099-1112(15)30100-2 · Cited by 2,584
Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States.
Fry, J. A., Xian, G., Jin, S., Dewitz, J. A., Homer, C. G., Yang, L., Barnes, C. A., Herold, N. D., & Wickham, J. (2011) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · Cited by 2,448
Minasny, B., Malone, B. P., McBratney, A. B., Angers, D. A., Arrouays, D., Chambers, A., Chaplot, V., Chen, Z.-S., Cheng, K., Das, B. S., et al. (2017) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002 · Cited by 2,239 · cited 1×
“These forward-looking studies have defined targets (1, 2), developed networks and methodologies (3, 4), and advanced soil and C cycle science along the way.”
BackgroundPaustian, K., Lehmann, J., Ogle, S., Reay, D., Robertson, G. P., & Smith, P. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17174 · Cited by 2,213
Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops – A meta-analysis
Poeplau, C., & Don, A. (2015) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024 · Cited by 1,651
Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool
Scharlemann, J. P., Tanner, E. V., Hiederer, R., & Kapos, V. (2014) · Carbon Management · doi:10.4155/cmt.13.77 · Cited by 1,612
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- JE Vogelmann, , Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover Dataset for the conterminous United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67, 650–662 (2001).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions
Bossio, D. A., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Fargione, J., Sanderman, J., Smith, P., Wood, S., Zomer, R. J., von Unger, M., Emmer, I. M., et al. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0491-z · Cited by 1,273
Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth
Cook‐Patton, S. C., Leavitt, S. M., Gibbs, D. A., Harris, N. L., Lister, K., Anderson‐Teixeira, K. J., Briggs, R. D., Chazdon, R. L., Crowther, T. W., Ellis, P. W., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2686-x · Cited by 687
The carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial ecosystems
Lal, R., Smith, P., Jungkunst, H. F., Mitsch, W. J., Lehmann, J., Nair, P. K. R., McBratney, A. B., de Moraes Sá, J. C., Schneider, J., Zinn, Y. L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.73.6.145a · Cited by 394
Domke, G. M., Oswalt, S. N., Walters, B. F., & Morin, R. S. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2010840117 · Cited by 266
Self-citationForest Management for Carbon Sequestration and Climate Adaptation
Ontl, T., Janowiak, M. K., Swanston, C. W., Daley, J., Handler, S. D., Cornett, M. W., Hagenbuch, S., Handrick, C., Mccarthy, L., & Patch, N. (2019) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jofore/fvz062 · Cited by 216
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nave, L. E., Domke, G. M., Hofmeister, K. L., Mishra, U., Perry, C. H., Walters, B. F., & Swanston, C. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- US Forest Service (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Argonne National Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2018-02-26
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2776-2781
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC5856546
- OpenAlex
- W2788264769
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- USDA-Forest Service (13-CR-112306-077, 16-CR-112306-071)
- National Science Foundation (EF-1340681)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest ecology and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
- Keywords
- reforestation, carbon sequestration, forest soils, topsoil carbon, forest carbon sink, carbon accumulation rates, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, land use change, cultivated land conversion, United States forests
- MeSH terms
- Carbon, Environmental Monitoring, Soil, Trees, United States, Greenhouse Effect, Forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
