Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic recovery of ErbB4 in adulthood partially restores brain functions in null mice

Wang, Hongsheng, Liu, Fang, Chen, Wenbing, Sun, Xiangdong, Cui, Wanpeng, Dong, Zhaoqi, Zhao, Kai, Zhang, Hongsheng, Li, Haiwen, Xing, Guanglin, Fei, Erkang, Pan, Bing-Xing, Li, Bao-Ming, Xiong, Wen-Cheng, Mei, Lin·2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: NRG1–ErbB4 signaling is implicated in GABAergic circuit assembly during development and GABAergic transmission at adulthood. However, it is unclear whether phenotypes in the adult stage in ErbB4 mutant mice result from abnormal neural development. By using two strains of mice with temporal control of ErbB4 deletion and expression, we demonstrate that ErbB4 deletion in adult mice impaired behavior and GABA release, whereas deficits due to ErbB4 null mutation during development were alleviated by restoring ErbB4 expression at the adult stage. Together, our results indicate that NRG1–ErbB4 signaling at adulthood is critical to GABAergic transmission and behavior and suggest that restoring NRG1–ErbB4 signaling at the postdevelopmental stage might benefit relevant brain disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1811287115

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1093/epirev/mxn001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/mp.2011.35 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.010 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.028 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1074/jbc.M800073200 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/1749-8104-7-10 · DOI
  7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2538-10.2011 · DOI
  8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1584-13.2013 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.089 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5317-10.2011 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02719.x · DOI
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2454-09.2009 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.04.016 · DOI
  14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2021-14.2014 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0669-17.2018 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.009 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0910302107 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nn.3005 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.029 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/npp.2014.274 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nn.3006 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.018 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.1010669107 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.007 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nature13595 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0053042 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/schbul/sbm129 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001817 · DOI
  29. 10.1086/342734 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/tp.2012.25 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/hmg/ddl122 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.schres.2009.03.017 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.056 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.017 · DOI
  35. 10.1159/000370075 · DOI
  36. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.9 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.schres.2015.11.008 · DOI
  38. 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000122 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/mgg3.169 · DOI
  40. 10.1097/00001756-200411150-00017 · DOI
  41. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15020150 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.09.010 · DOI
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036431 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.028 · DOI
  45. 10.1073/pnas.0900355106 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1038/tp.2016.279 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/s00702-017-1782-z · DOI
  48. 10.1097/MD.0000000000005920 · DOI
  49. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1529-11.2011 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/npp.2012.57 · DOI
  51. J Neddens, A Buonanno, Selective populations of hippocampal interneurons express ErbB4 and their number and distribution is altered in ErbB4 knockout mice. Hippocampus 20, 724–744 (2010). · DOI
  52. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2090-13.2013 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.03.028 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.gde.2010.12.010 · DOI
  55. 10.15252/embj.201798858 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/cne.23615 · DOI
  57. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5599-07.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.018 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nm1418 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Liu, F., Chen, W., Sun, X., Cui, W., Dong, Z., Zhao, K., Zhang, H., Li, H., Xing, G., Fei, E., Pan, B.-X., Li, B.-M., Xiong, W.-C., & Mei, L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106;
  • Department of Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912;
  • School of Basic Medical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 510260 Guangzhou, Guangdong, China;
  • Institute of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2018-11-29
Volume
115
Issue
51
Pages
13105-13110
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
45
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (MH083317, MH109280)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS082007, NS090083)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging (AG051773, AG045781)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review