Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation.
“framing environmental issues in terms of conservative values such as purity, sanctity, commerce or patriotism might lead conservatives to express more support for pro-environmental legislation275–279.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [279]
Cites
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · see citing works
The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612449177 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209351435 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Dunlap, R. E., Xiao, C., & McCright, A. M. (2001) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/714000580 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2019) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12501 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
When and How Different Motives Can Drive Motivated Political Reasoning
Bayes, R., Druckman, J. N., Goods, A., & Molden, D. C. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12663 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University Cascades (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wolsko, Christopher
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 7-19
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2283207560
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8
- FWCI
- 63.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Keywords
- moral framing, climate change attitudes, environmental protection behavior, political polarization, liberals and conservatives, environmental donations, patriotism, attitude change, persuasive messages
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
