Cited by 933Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 25 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex

Open access
Edwards, Frank, Lee, Hedwig, Esposito, Michael·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We use data on police-involved deaths to estimate how the risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States varies across social groups. We estimate the lifetime and age-specific risks of being killed by police by race and sex. We also provide estimates of the proportion of all deaths accounted for by police use of force. We find that African American men and women, American Indian/Alaska Native men and women, and Latino men face higher lifetime risk of being killed by police than do their white peers. We find that Latina women and Asian/Pacific Islander men and women face lower risk of being killed by police than do their white peers. Risk is highest for black men, who (at current levels of risk) face about a 1 in 1,000 chance of being killed by police over the life course. The average lifetime odds of being killed by police are about 1 in 2,000 for men and about 1 in 33,000 for women. Risk peaks between the ages of 20 y and 35 y for all groups. For young men of color, police use of force is among the leading causes of death.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1821204116

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

44 Own result · 5 Own method · 4 Sources not found · 4 No full text of the sources · 4 No basis given · 3 Partly supported · 2 Not checked yet · 2 Own interpretation · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 50 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 12
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 4
18 of 18
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Underlying age-specific mortality risks remain constant at observed 2013–2018 levels throughout the life course.

    “with the central assumption that risk profiles observed between 2013 and 2018 remain stable”
    “with the key assumption that underlying age-specific mortality risks remain constant at observed levels throughout the life course”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. J. Soss, V. Weaver, Learning from Ferguson: Policing, race, and class in American politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 20, 565–591 (2017).
  2. A. S. Vitale, The End of Policing (Verso Books, New York, NY, 2017).
  3. T. Y. Rocha Beardall “Transactional policing: Reframing local police-community relations through the lens of police employment ” PhD thesis Cornell University Ithaca NY (2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 933

Metadata

Authors
Edwards, F., Lee, H., & Esposito, M.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Frank
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-08-05
Volume
116
Issue
34
Pages
16793-16798
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2965198355
Cited by
916
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 188 · 2021: 161 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 7
FWCI
467.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
police use of force, racial disparities, age-specific risk, sex differences, African American men, Hispanic men, Hispanic women, young men of color, causes of death
MeSH terms
Adult, Death, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Risk, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Police, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-29, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-29 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review