Cited by 316Skin Protection and AgingNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesTea Polyphenols and Effects

Topical applications of caffeine or (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) inhibit carcinogenesis and selectively increase apoptosis in UVB-induced skin tumors in mice

Open access
Lu, Yao-Ping, Lou, You-Rong, Xie, Jian-Guo, Peng, Qing-Yun, Liao, Jie, Yang, Chung S., Huang, Mou-Tuan, Conney, Allan H.·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

SKH-1 hairless mice were irradiated with ultraviolet B (UVB) twice weekly for 20 weeks. These tumor-free mice, which had a high risk of developing skin tumors during the next several months, were then treated topically with caffeine (6.2 μmol) or (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG; 6.5 μmol) once a day 5 days a week for 18 weeks in the absence of further treatment with UVB. Topical applications of caffeine to these mice decreased the number of nonmalignant and malignant skin tumors per mouse by 44% and 72%, respectively. Topical applications of EGCG decreased the number of nonmalignant and malignant tumors per mouse by 55% and 66%, respectively. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that topical applications of caffeine or EGCG increased apoptosis as measured by the number of caspase 3-positive cells in nonmalignant skin tumors by 87% or 72%, respectively, and in squamous cell carcinomas by 92% or 56%, respectively, but there was no effect on apoptosis in nontumor areas of the epidermis. Topical applications of caffeine or EGCG had a small inhibitory effect on proliferation in nonmalignant tumors as measured by BrdUrd labeling (16–22%), and there was also a similar, but nonsignificant, inhibitory effect on proliferation in malignant tumors. The results suggest a need for further studies to determine whether topical applications of caffeine or EGCG can inhibit sunlight-induced skin cancer in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.182429899

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Green tea polyphenols protect against photocarcinogenesis.

    “| (epicatechin-3-gallate), | from tea | Photocarcinogenesis | | + | (117-119) |”

    From Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies (2010) · cites this paper as [119]

    The Abstract reports that topical EGCG, a tea constituent, reduced skin tumors in UVB-pretreated mice, and the Discussion describes inhibition of UVB-induced carcinogenesis. This supports the claim for EGCG in mice, but the study does not establish protection by green tea polyphenols as a class or in humans. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. [1]Nataraj A. J., Trent, J. C., II & Ananthaswamy, H. N. (1995) Photochem. Photobiol. 62, 218-230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]McKenzie R., Connor, B. & Bodeker, G. (1999) Science 285, 1709-1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Stern R. S., Weinstein, M. C. & Baker, S. G. (1986) Arch. Dermatol. 122, 537-545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Glanz K., Saraiya, M. & Wechsler, H. (2002) Morbid. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51, 1-18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Lou Y.-R., Lu, Y.-P., Xie, J.-G., Huang, M.-T. & Conney, A. H. (1999) Nutr. Cancer 33, 146-153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Lu Y.-P., Lou, Y.-R., Xie, J.-G., Yen, P., Huang, M.-T. & Conney, A. H. (1997) Carcinogenesis 18, 2163-2169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Bogovski P. (1994) in Pathology of Tumors in Laboratory Animals—Vol. II: Tumors of the Mouse,, eds. Turusov, V. S. & Mohr, U. (International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France), IARC Scientific Publication No. 111, pp. 1–26.
  8. [8]Lu Y.-P., Lou, Y.-R., Lin, Y., Shih, W. J., Huang, M.-T., Yang, C. S. & Conney, A. H. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 5002-5009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]Lu Y.-P., Lou, Y.-R., Li, X. H., Xie, J.-G., Brash, D., Huang, M.-T. & Conney, A. H. (2000) Cancer Res. 60, 4785-4791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]Lu, Y.-P., Lou, Y.-R., Li, X. H., Xie, J.-G., Lin, Y., Shih, W. J. & Conney, A. H. (2002) Oncol. Res., in press. [PubMed]
  11. [11]Qi W., Qiao, D. & Martinez, J. D. (2002) Radiat. Res. 157, 166-174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Hayakawa S., Saeki, K., Sazuka, M., Suzuki, Y., Shoji, Y., Ohta, T., Kaji, K., Yuo, A. & Isemura, M. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 285, 1102-1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Chen Z. P., Schell, J. B., Ho, C.-T. & Chen, K. Y. (1998) Cancer Lett. 129, 173-179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [14]Yang G. Y., Liao, J., Kim, K., Yurkow, E. J. & Yang, C. S. (1998) Carcinogenesis 19, 611-616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [15]Hakim I. A., Harris, R. B. & Weisgerber, U. M. (2000) Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prevent. 9, 727-731. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [16]Rapuri P. B., Gallagher, J. C., Kinyamu, H. K. & Ryschon, K. L. (2001) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 74, 694-700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [17]Massey L. K. (2001) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 74, 569-570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [18]Yang C. S., Maliakal, P. & Meng, X. (2002) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 42, 25-54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. [19]Katiyar S. K., Ahmad, N. & Mukhtar, H. (2000) Arch. Dermatol. 136, 989-994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [20]Yang C. S., Prabhu, S. & Landau, J. (2001) Drug Metab. Rev. 33, 237-253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [21]Zajdela F. & Latarjet, R. (1973) C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 277, 1073-1076. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [22]Zajdela F. & Latarjet, R. (1978) Bull. Cancer 65, 305-314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [23]Rothwell K. (1974) Nature (London) 252, 69-70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. [24]Perchellet J.-P. & Boutwell, R. K. (1981) Cancer Res. 41, 3927-3935. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. [25]Nomura T. (1976) Nature (London) 260, 547-549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. [26]Nomura T. (1980) Cancer Res. 40, 1332-1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. [27]Nomura T. (1983) Cancer Res. 43, 1342-1346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. [28]Theiss J. C. & Shimkin, M. B. (1978) Cancer Res. 38, 1757-1761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. [29]VanderPloeg L. C. & Welsch, C. W. (1991) Cancer Lett. 56, 245-250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. [30]Nagasawa H. & Konishi, R. (1988) Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 24, 803-805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. [31]Welsch C. W., Scieszka, K. M., Senn, E. R. & DeHoog, J. V. (1983) Int. J. Cancer 32, 479-484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. [32]Welsch C. W., DeHoog, J. V. & O'Connor, D. H. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 2078-2082. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. [33]Minton J. P., Abou-Issa, H., Foecking, M. K. & Sriram, M. G. (1983) Cancer 51, 1249-1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. [34]Hiroshino H. & Tanooka, H. (1979) Toxicol. Lett. 4, 83-85. [Google Scholar]
  35. [35]Lin J. K., Liang, Y. C. & Lin-Shiau, S. Y. (1999) Biochem. Pharmacol. 58, 911-915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. [36]Ahmad N., Gupta, S. & Mukhtar, H. (2000) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 376, 338-346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. [37]Fujiki H., Suganuma, M., Okabe, S., Sueoka, N., Komori, A., Sueoka, E., Kozu, T., Tada, Y., Suga, K., Imai, K. & Nakachi, K. (1998) Mutat. Res. 402, 307-310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. [38]Ahmad N., Cheng, P. & Mukhtar, H. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 275, 328-334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. [39]Tan X., Hu, D., Li, S., Han, Y., Zhang, Y. & Ahou, D. (2000) Cancer Lett. 158, 1-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. [40]Schlegel R. & Pardee, A. B. (1986) Science 232, 1264-1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. [41]Yao S. L., Akhtar, A. J., McKenna, K. A., Bedi, G. C., Sidransky, D., Mabry, M., Ravi, R., Collector, M. I., Jones, R. J., Sharkis, S. J., et al. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 1140-1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. [42]Russell K. J., Wiens, L. W., Demers, G. W., Galloway, D. A., Plon, S. E. & Groudine, M. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 1639-1642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. [43]Powell S. N., DeFrank, J. S., Connell, P., Eogan, M., Preffer, F., Dombkowski, D., Tang, W. & Friend, S. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 1643-1648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. [44]Musk S. R. & Steel, G. G. (1990) Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 57, 1105-1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. [45]Sarkaria J. N., Busby, E. C., Tibbetts, R. S., Roos, P., Taya, Y., Karnitz, L. M. & Abraham, R. T. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 4375-4382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. [46]Higuchi K., Mitsuhashi, N., Saitoh, J.-J., Maebayashi, K., Sakurai, H., Akimoto, T. & Niibe, H. (2000) Cancer Lett. 152, 157-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. [47]Nghiem P., Park, P. K., Kim, Y.-S., Vaziri, C. & Schreiber, S. L. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9092-9097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. [48]Nghiem P., Park, P. K., Kim, Y.-S., Desai, B. N. & Schreiber, S. L. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 4428-4434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, Y.-P., Lou, Y.-R., Xie, J.-G., Peng, Q.-Y., Liao, J., Yang, C. S., Huang, M.-T., & Conney, A. H.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-08-30
Volume
99
Issue
19
Pages
12455-12460
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2066022538
Cited by
316
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 26
FWCI
22.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA88961)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA088961, CA 88961)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
Keywords
caffeine, epigallocatechin gallate, topical application, skin carcinogenesis, apoptosis, caspase-3, squamous cell carcinoma, cell proliferation, SKH-1 mice, photoprotection
MeSH terms
Administration, Topical, Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Caffeine, Catechin, Female, Mice, Hairless, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Skin Neoplasms, Tea, Ultraviolet Rays, Apoptosis, Caspases, Mice, Caspase 3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review