Cited by 129Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Cells and MetastasisTGF-β signaling in diseases

Epithelial to mesenchymal plasticity and differential response to therapies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Open access
Porter, Rebecca L., Magnus, Neelima K. C., Thapar, Vishal, Morris, Robert, Szabolcs, Annamaria, Neyaz, Azfar, Kulkarni, Anupriya S., Tai, Eric +22 more·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Transcriptional profiling has defined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) into distinct subtypes with the majority being classical epithelial (E) or quasi-mesenchymal (QM). Despite clear differences in clinical behavior, growing evidence indicates these subtypes exist on a continuum with features of both subtypes present and suggestive of interconverting cell states. Here, we investigated the impact of different therapies being evaluated in PDAC on the phenotypic spectrum of the E/QM state. We demonstrate using RNA-sequencing and RNA-in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) that FOLFIRINOX combination chemotherapy induces a common shift of both E and QM PDAC toward a more QM state in cell lines and patient tumors. In contrast, Vitamin D, another drug under clinical investigation in PDAC, induces distinct transcriptional responses in each PDAC subtype, with augmentation of the baseline E and QM state. Importantly, this translates to functional changes that increase metastatic propensity in QM PDAC, but decrease dissemination in E PDAC in vivo models. These data exemplify the importance of both the initial E/QM subtype and the plasticity of E/QM states in PDAC in influencing response to therapy, which highlights their relevance in guiding clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1914915116

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ting and colleagues have shown evidence of subtype "drift" in PDAC tissues with various therapies.

    “Of note, a recent assessment for “basal-like” and “classical” cells in PDAC tissues by subtype-specific protein markers has uncovered bi-phenotypic “hybrid” cells51, while Ting and colleagues have shown evidence of subtype “drift” in PDAC tissues with various therapies52, both lines of evidence supporting the plasticity of subtype states.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porter, R. L., Magnus, N. K. C., Thapar, V., Morris, R., Szabolcs, A., Neyaz, A., Kulkarni, A. S., Tai, E., Chougule, A., Hillis, A., Golczer, G., Guo, H., Yamada, T., Kurokawa, T., Yashaswini, C., Ligorio, M., Vo, K. D., Nieman, L., Liss, A. S., Deshpande, V., Lawrence, M. S., Maheswaran, S., Fernandez-Del Castillo, C., Hong, T. S., Ryan, D. P., O’Dwyer, P. J., Drebin, J. A., Ferrone, C. R., Haber, D. A., & Ting, D. T.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114;
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114;
  • Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19014;
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Haber, Daniel A.
  • Ting, David T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-12-16
Volume
116
Issue
52
Pages
26835-26845
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2995007557
Cited by
129
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 9
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • EIF | Stand Up To Cancer (2015-002)
  • Lustgarten Foundation (2015-002)
  • Warshaw Institute (N/A)
  • National Science Foundation (PHY-1549535)
  • ACD-Biotechne (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, tumor subtypes, FOLFIRINOX, vitamin D, treatment response, metastasis, gene expression profiling, drug response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review