Cited by 62Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Sexually dimorphic role of oxytocin in medaka mate choice

Open access
Yokoi, Saori, Naruse, Kiyoshi, Kamei, Yasuhiro, Ansai, Satoshi, Kinoshita, Masato, Mito, Mari, Iwasaki, Shintaro, Inoue, Shuntaro +4 more·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Oxytocin is a central neuromodulator required for facilitating mate preferences for familiar individuals in a monogamous rodent (prairie vole), irrespective of sex. While the role of oxytocin in mate choice is only understood in a few monogamous species, its function in nonmonogamous species, comprising the vast majority of vertebrate species, remains unclear. To address this issue, we evaluated the involvement of an oxytocin homolog (isotocin, referred herein as oxt) in mate choice in medaka fish ( Oryzias latipes ). Female medaka prefer to choose familiar mates, whereas male medaka court indiscriminately, irrespective of familiarity. We generated mutants of the oxt ligand ( oxt ) and receptor genes ( oxtr1 and oxtr2 ) and revealed that the oxt-oxtr1 signaling pathway was essential for eliciting female mate preference for familiar males. This pathway was also required for unrestricted and indiscriminate mating strategy in males. That is, either oxt or oxtr1 mutation in males decreased the number of courtship displays toward novel females, but not toward familiar females. Further, males with these mutations exhibited enhanced mate-guarding behaviors toward familiar females, but not toward novel females. In addition, RNA-sequencing (seq) analysis revealed that the transcription of genes involved in gamma-amino butyric acid metabolism as well as those encoding ion-transport ATPase are up-regulated in both oxt and oxtr1 mutants only in female medaka, potentially explaining the sex difference of the mutant phenotype. Our findings provide genetic evidence that oxt-oxtr1 signaling plays a role in the mate choice for familiar individuals in a sex-specific manner in medaka fish.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1921446117

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutating oxytocin receptors using CRISPR reduces mating preference in female medaka and results in the emergence of preference for familiar females in males.

    “However, mutating oxytocin receptors using CRISPR reduces mating preference in females and results in the emergence of preference for familiar females in males (Yokoi et al. 2020).”

    From Oxytocin, Neural Plasticity, and Social Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Yokoi et al. 2020

    The Results report that oxtr1 mutation removes females’ preference for familiar males and produces a preference for familiar females in males. But the Results section on mutant generation says oxtr1 mutants were made using TALEN, not CRISPR/Cas9; the receptor mutated with CRISPR/Cas9 was oxtr2. The claim gets the behavioral findings right but attributes them to the wrong editing method. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Oxytocin mediates mating preferences in polygamous species.

    “Oxytocin also mediates mating preferences in polygamous species.”

    From Oxytocin, Neural Plasticity, and Social Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as Yokoi et al. 2020

  • Females with targeted Oxt or Oxtr mutations lose preference for familiar males and mate indiscriminately, while Oxt or Oxtr mutant males preferentially mate with familiar females.

    “Females with targeted Oxt or Oxtr mutations lose preference for familiar males and mate indiscriminately, while Oxt or Oxtr mutant males preferentially mate with familiar females.”
  • Thus, OXTR signaling promotes the adaptive mate preference of particular species, which in promiscuous species may be sexually dimorphic.

    “Thus, OXTR signaling promotes the adaptive mate preference of particular species, which in promiscuous species may be sexually dimorphic (28).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]Yokoi S., Mito M., Iwasaki S., Nakagawa S., Takeuchi H., The gene expression of the brain/pituitary from oxt/oxtr1 homozygous mutants and WT medaka in both sexes. GEO. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE139158. Deposited 21 October 2019.
  2. [25]Wang M. Y., Takeuchi H.. Individual recognition and the ‘face inversion effect’ in medaka fish (Oryzias latipes). elife 6, e24728 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yokoi, S., Naruse, K., Kamei, Y., Ansai, S., Kinoshita, M., Mito, M., Iwasaki, S., Inoue, S., Okuyama, T., Nakagawa, S., Young, L. J., & Takeuchi, H.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Basic Biology (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • Okayama University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Yokoi, Saori
  • Takeuchi, Hideaki
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-02-18
Volume
117
Issue
9
Pages
4802-4808
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3007375964
Cited by
62
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • MEXT | NINS | National Institute for Basic Biology (10-104, 19-347)
  • MEXT | National Institutes of Natural Sciences (#01111904)
  • MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K18369, 19K16247, 16H06524, 18H02479, 16H01276, Grant-in-Aid for JSPS fellows)
  • Sumitomo Foundation (180597)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
oxytocin, isotocin, mate choice, medaka, sex differences, courtship behavior, mate guarding, familiarity, GABA metabolism, social behavior genetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Courtship, Female, Male, Mutation, Oryzias, Oxytocin, Phenotype, Reproduction, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Characteristics, Receptors, Oxytocin, Recognition, Psychology, Mating Preference, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review