Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SCAMP5 plays a critical role in axonal trafficking and synaptic localization of NHE6 to adjust quantal size at glutamatergic synapses

Lee, Unghwi, Choi, Chunghon, Ryu, Seung Hyun, Park, Daehun, Lee, Sang-Eun, Kim, Kitae, Kim, Yujin, Chang, Sunghoe·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: As a vesicular Na + (K + )/H + exchanger, NHE6 promotes glutamate filling into synaptic vesicles (SVs). Thus, proper localization of NHE6 is critical for determining synaptic strength at glutamatergic synapses, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. We found that an SV-enriched protein, SCAMP5, is a key determinant for axonal trafficking and synaptic localization of NHE6. By perturbing their interaction, NHE6 fails to be localized at synaptic sites, resulting in hyperacidification of the SV lumen and a significant reduction in the quantal size of glutamate released. Since both are autism candidate genes, our results suggest that impaired interaction between two proteins could relate to the synaptic dysfunction observed in autism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2011371118

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NHE6 is ubiquitously expressed in all cells of the body, but in the CNS it is highly expressed in neurons and to a lesser extent in glial cells.

    “NHE6 is ubiquitously expressed in all cells of the body, however, in the CNS it is highly expressed in neurons where abundant synaptic vesicles and neurotransmitter receptors recycle in synapses (Lee et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2021) and to a lesser extent in glial cells (Zhang et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00002 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s00424-008-0458-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s00424-003-1110-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1152/ajpcell.00360.2004 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nrm2820 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/brain/awr250 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/mp.2013.28 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101644 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/ana.24225 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.1157657 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00172 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nn.2898 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.046 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41467-017-02716-5 · DOI
  16. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4074-09.2010 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.043 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-07941.2000 · DOI
  19. 10.1074/jbc.274.46.32551 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/hmg/ddq013 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/s00439-020-02123-9 · DOI
  22. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105927 · DOI
  23. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-14.2014 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.088 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M807055200 · DOI
  26. 10.1242/jcs.02315 · DOI
  27. 10.1074/jbc.M705146200 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.peptides.2004.12.015 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/mp.2010.54 · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.M114.602219 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/acssensors.8b01599 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00037 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/elps.200700729 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/nmeth.2333 · DOI
  36. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2945-19.2020 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.braindev.2012.03.010 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33093 · DOI
  39. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2744-15.2016 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.ceca.2017.03.007 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.024 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.018 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/ncomms15884 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1186/1478-811X-9-22 · DOI
  45. 10.1074/jbc.M807620200 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/brain/awq071 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/nprot.2012.074 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, U., Choi, C., Ryu, S. H., Park, D., Lee, S.-E., Kim, K., Kim, Y., & Chang, S.
Affiliations
Department of Physiology and Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, South Korea;
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-12-28
Volume
118
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
18
References
5
Language
en
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (2019R1A2C2089182, 2017M3C7A1044958)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review