Cited by 175Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFish Biology and Ecology StudiesEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates

Open access
Venkatesh, Byrappa, Erdmann, Mark V., Brenner, Sydney·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The evolutionary relationships of gnathostomes (jawed vertebrates), which comprise chondrichthyans (cartilaginous fishes), lobe-finned fishes (coelacanths and lungfishes), tetrapods, and actinopterygians (ray-finned fishes), have been debated for almost a century. Phylogenetic analyses based on fossils, morphology, and molecular sequences have generated different models of relationships that remain unresolved. We identified 13 derived shared molecular markers (synapomorphies) that define clades in the vertebrate lineage and used them to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of extant jawed vertebrates. Our markers include the presence or absence of insertions and deletions in coding sequences, nuclear introns, and alternatively spliced transcripts. The synapomorphies identified by us are congruent with each other and give rise to a single phylogenetic tree. This tree confirms that chondrichthyans are basal to all living gnathostomes, that lungfishes (Dipnoi) are the closest living relatives of tetrapods, and that bichirs (Cladistia) are the living members of the most ancient family of ray-finned fishes. Our study also provides molecular evidence to support the monophyly of living tetrapods and teleosts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.201415598

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Venkatesh, B., Erdmann, M. V., & Brenner, S.
Affiliations
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (SG)
Corresponding author
Venkatesh, Byrappa
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-09-11
Volume
98
Issue
20
Pages
11382-11387
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1991578536
Cited by
175
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
gnathostomes, jawed vertebrates, synapomorphies, molecular markers, vertebrate phylogeny, Chondrichthyes, lungfish, tetrapods, Actinopterygii, coelacanth, bichir, Cladistia, monophyly, teleosts, alternative splicing, nuclear introns
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Biological Evolution, Fishes, Fossils, Humans, Jaw, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, Phylogeny, Pro-Opiomelanocortin, Vertebrates, Sequence Alignment, Genes, RAG-1, Sequence Deletion, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Homeodomain Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Transposases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review