CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Archaeological Research and ProtectionArchaeological and Geological StudiesUrban Design and Spatial Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Importance of Energetics in Archaeological Least Cost Analysis

Field, Sean, Glowacki, Donna M., Gettler, Lee T.·2023·Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
DOI 10.1007/s10816-022-09564-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10816-022-09564-8

Cites

114 of 118 references verified2 citation errors · 2 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LCP algorithms predominantly used nowadays are slope-based, assuming that movement through terrain is either a time-saving or energy-saving process.

    “LCP algorithms predominantly used nowadays are slopebased assuming that movement through terrain is either time-saving or energysaving process and methods were developed to assess which might have played more role in decision making when establishing a path (Field et al., 2023).”

    From Using Archaeological Road Data to Evaluate Limits of Topography on Road Location: Roman Roads in the Near East as a Test Case (2026) · cites this paper as Field et al., 2023

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Betancourt, J. T., Martin, P. S., & Van Devender, T. R. (1986). Fossil packrat middens from Chaco Canyon, New Mexico: Cultural and ecological significance. In S. G. Wells, D. W. Love, & T. W. Gardner (Eds.), Chaco Canyon Country: A field guide to the geomorphology, Quaternary geology, Paleoecology, and Environmental Geology of Northwestern New Mexico (pp. 207–217). American Geomorphological Field Group.
  2. Kincaid, C., Stein, J.R., & Levine, D.F. (1983) Road verification summary. In C. Kincaid (Ed.), Chaco Roads Project, Phase 1: A Reappraisal of Prehispanic Roads in the San Juan Basin. Albuquerque and Santa Fe, NM: United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management.
  3. Lekson, S. (1984). Great Pueblo architecture of Chaco Canyon. In Leone, M (Ed.), Publications in Archaeology 18B, Chaco Canyon Studies. Santa Fe, NM: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.
  4. Livingood, P. (2012). No crows made mounds: Do cost-distance calculations of travel time improve our understanding of southern Appalachian polity size? In D. A. White & S. Surface-Evans (Eds.), Least cost analysis of social landscapes: Archaeological case studies (pp. 174–187). University of Utah Press.
  5. Reed, E. K. (1962). Human skeletal material from Site 59, Chaco Canyon National Monument. El. Palacio, 69(4), 240–247.
  6. Rissetto, J. D. (2012). Using least cost path analysis to reinterpret later Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherer procurement zones in Northern Spain. In D. A. White & S. Surface-Evans (Eds.), Least cost analysis of social landscapes: Archaeological case studies (pp. 11–31). University of Utah Press.
  7. Roney, J. R. (1992). Prehispanic roads and regional integration in the Chacoan System. In: Doyel, DE (ed.), Anasazi regional organization and the chaco system, 123–31. Albuquerque, NM: Maxwell Museum of Anthropology.
  8. Verhagen, P. and Jeneson, K. (2012). A Roman puzzle. Trying to find the via Belgica with GIS. In A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, & C. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Thinking beyond the tool: archaeological computing & the interpretive process, (pp. 123–130). Oxford: Archaeopress.
  9. White, D. A. (2012). Prehistoric trail networks of the Western Papagueria: A multifaceted least cost graph theory analysis. In D. A. White & S. Surface-Evans (Eds.), Least cost analysis of social landscapes: Archaeological case studies (pp. 188–208). University of Utah Press.
  10. Wilshusen, R. H., & Van Dyke, R. M. (2006). Chaco’s beginnings. In S. Lekson (Ed.), The archaeology of Chaco Canyon: An eleventh century Pueblo regional center (pp. 211–260). School of American Research Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Field, S., Glowacki, D. M., & Gettler, L. T.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
Field, Sean
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-05-21
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
363-396
ISSN
  • 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7764
DOI
10.1007/s10816-022-09564-8
OpenAlex
W4281253050
Cited by
13
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Keywords
cost-minimization analysis, energetics, fatigue, cost function, human movement, southwestern United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review