Cited by 707Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Naturally occurring variations in maternal behavior in the rat are associated with differences in estrogen-inducible central oxytocin receptors

Open access
Champagne, Frances, Diorio, Josie, Sharma, Shakti, Meaney, Michael J.·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Naturally occurring variations in maternal licking/grooming influence neural development and are transmitted from mother to female offspring. We found that the induction of maternal behavior in virgin females through constant exposure to pups (pup sensitization) was significantly shorter in the offspring of High compared with Low licking/grooming mothers, suggesting differences in maternal responsivity. In randomly selected females screened for individual differences in maternal responsivity and subsequently mated, there was a significant and negative correlation (r = -0.73) between the latency to exhibit maternal behavior in the pup sensitization paradigm and the frequency of pup licking/grooming during lactation. Females that were more maternally responsive to pups and that showed increased levels of pup licking/grooming also showed significantly higher oxytocin receptor levels in the medial preoptic area, the lateral septum, the central nucleus (n.) of the amygdala, the paraventricular n. of the hypothalamus, and the bed n. of the stria terminalis. Intracerebroventricular administration of an oxytocin receptor antagonist to mothers on postpartum day 3 completely eliminated the differences in pup licking/grooming, suggesting that differences in oxytocin receptor levels are functionally related to maternal behavior. Finally, estrogen treatment of virgin females significantly increased oxytocin receptor binding in the medial preoptic area and lateral septum of female offspring of High, but not Low, licking/grooming mothers. These findings suggest that maternal licking/grooming influences the development of estrogen sensitivity in brain regions that regulate maternal behavior, providing a potential mechanism for the intergenerational transmission of individual differences in maternal behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.221224598

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. T L Bale, C A Pedersen, D M Dorsa Adv Exp Med Biol 395, 269–280 (1995).
  2. 10.1210/endo.138.7.5255 · DOI · Paper page
  3. B W O'Malley, W T Schrader, S K Mani, C Smith, N L Weigel, O M Conneely, J H Clark Rec Prog Horm Res 50, 333–347 (1995).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 707

Metadata

Authors
Champagne, F., Diorio, J., Sharma, S., & Meaney, M. J.
Affiliations
Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Meaney, Michael J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-10-16
Volume
98
Issue
22
Pages
12736-12741
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2056856182
Cited by
707
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 37
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
maternal behavior, oxytocin receptor, estrogen sensitivity, intergenerational transmission, maternal responsiveness, medial preoptic area, lateral septum, amygdala, paraventricular nucleus, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, oxytocin receptor antagonist, individual differences, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Autoradiography, Brain, Estrogens, Female, Grooming, Maternal Behavior, Receptors, Oxytocin, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review