Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pattern of diversity in the genomic region near the maize domestication gene tb1

Open access
Clark, Richard M., Linton, Eric, Messing, Joachim, Doebley, John F.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Domesticated maize and its wild ancestor (teosinte) differ strikingly in morphology and afford an opportunity to examine the connection between strong selection and diversity in a major crop species. The tb1 gene largely controls the increase in apical dominance in maize relative to teosinte, and a region of the tb1 locus 5′ to the transcript sequence was a target of selection during maize domestication. To better characterize the impact of selection at a major “domestication” locus, we have sequenced the upstream tb1 genomic region and systematically sampled nucleotide diversity for sites located as far as 163 kb upstream to tb1 . Our analyses define a selective sweep of ≈60–90 kb 5′ to the tb1 transcribed sequence. The selected region harbors a mixture of unique sequences and large repetitive elements, but it contains no predicted genes. Diversity at the nearest 5′ gene to tb1 is typical of that for neutral maize loci, indicating that selection at tb1 has had a minimal impact on the surrounding chromosomal region. Our data also show low intergenic linkage disequilibrium in the region and suggest that selection has had a minor role in shaping the pattern of linkage disequilibrium that is observed. Finally, our data raise the possibility that maize-like tb1 haplotypes are present in extant teosinte populations, and our findings also suggest a model of tb1 gene regulation that differs from traditional views of how plant gene expression is controlled.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2237049100

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1126/science.277.5329.1063 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1017/S0016672301005158 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/genetics/155.2.855 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.289.5476.85 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/22307 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/genetics/162.2.941 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9888 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/genetics/129.1.285 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/genetics/134.2.559 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/genetics/141.1.333 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/386485a0 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00444.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1017/S0016672399004073 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/genetics/162.4.1927 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1104/pp.013474 · DOI
  16. 10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1101/gr.8.3.195 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1105/tpc.006338 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.11.1046 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1101/gr.789803 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1101/gr.142200 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.151244298 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/genetics/158.1.401 · DOI
  26. 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1997 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1455 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.141221898 · DOI
  29. Doebley, J. & Stec, A. (1998) Maize Genet. Coop. News Lett. 73, 82–83.
  30. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01648.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1086/339155 · DOI
  32. 10.1104/pp.125.3.1198 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1093/genetics/150.2.863 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4441 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/genetics/162.2.851 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/genetics/116.1.153 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.539 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1395 · DOI
  42. 10.1101/gr.268302 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.1032999100 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1073/pnas.132259199 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1073/pnas.242746799 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nature00813 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/molbev/msg162 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1073/pnas.201394398 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02557-X · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1093/genetics/162.4.1849 · DOI
  51. Xu, X., Hsia, A. P., Zhang, L., Nikolau, B. J. & Schnable, P. S. (1995) Plant Cell 7, 2151–2161.8718625
  52. 10.1073/pnas.022635499 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/genetics/162.2.917 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/genetics/162.1.365 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.052125199 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1007/BF02866877 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Clark, R. M., Linton, E., Messing, J., & Doebley, J. F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2003-12-30
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
700-707
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2026906578
Cited by
307
References
3
FWCI
11.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.