Cited by 50Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeological and Geochemical AnalysisEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Cambrian explosion condensed: High-precision geochronology of the lower Wood Canyon Formation, Nevada

Open access
Nelson, Lyle L., Crowley, James L., Smith, Emily F., Schwartz, Darin M., Hodgin, Eben B., Schmitz, Mark D.·2023·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The geologically rapid appearance of fossils of modern animal phyla within Cambrian strata is a defining characteristic of the history of life on Earth. However, temporal calibration of the base of the Cambrian Period remains uncertain within millions of years, which has resulted in mounting challenges to the concept of a discrete Cambrian explosion. We present precise zircon U-Pb dates for the lower Wood Canyon Formation, Nevada. These data demonstrate the base of the Cambrian Period, as defined by both ichnofossil biostratigraphy and carbon isotope chemostratigraphy, was younger than 533 Mya, at least 6 My later than currently recognized. This new geochronology condenses previous age models for the Nemakit-Daldynian (early Cambrian) and, integrated with global records, demonstrates an explosive tempo to the early radiation of modern animal phyla.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2301478120

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary, defined by the first appearance of Treptichnus pedum, has been suggested to coincide with, or immediately postdate, the nadir of the BACE, but both the precise position and the age of onset of the BACE (~538 to 535 Ma) remain uncertain.

    “The Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary, defined by the first appearance of the ichnospecies Treptichnus pedum and the lowest level of the associated T. pedum ichnozone, has been suggested to coincide with, or immediately postdate, the nadir of the “Basal Cambrian negative carbon isotope (δ13C) excursion” (BACE), but both the precise position of this first appearance relative to the BACE nadir and the age”

    From Sea level controls on Ediacaran-Cambrian animal radiations (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The biotic transition broadly coincides with the BACE, which marks a global perturbation of the marine carbon cycle, but the relationship of this to any potential extinction mechanism, such as a rise in shallow marine anoxia, is not established.

    “This biotic transition broadly coincides with the BACE, which marks a global perturbation of the marine carbon cycle [e.g., see (30, 33–35)], but the relationship of this to any potential extinction mechanism, such as a rise in shallow marine anoxia, is not established.”

    From Sea level controls on Ediacaran-Cambrian animal radiations (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The absolute timing of the decline of Ediacaran soft-bodied taxa may be related to the fact that the 538- to 533-Ma interval is poorly represented on a global scale due to the sparsity of spatially distributed successions that are currently well constrained in time.

    “The absolute timing of the decline of Ediacaran soft-bodied taxa (temporally constrained only in Laurentia after ~535 Ma) (18, 30) may be related to the fact that the 538- to 533-Ma interval is poorly represented on a global scale due to the sparsity of spatially distributed successions that are currently well constrained in time”

    From Sea level controls on Ediacaran-Cambrian animal radiations (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]C. D. Walcott, “ The fauna of the Lower Cambrian or Olenellus Zone” in Tenth Annual Report of the Director, 1888-1889. Part 1 (United States Geological Survey, 1890), pp. 509– 774.
  2. [3]R. C. Sprigg, Early Cambrian (?) jellyfishes from the flinders ranges, South Australia. Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 71, 212– 224 (1947).
  3. [22]S. Jensen, M. L. Droser, N. A. Heim, Trace fossils and ichnofabrics of the Lower Cambrian Wood Canyon Formation, southwest Death Valley area in Proterozoic-Cambrian of the Great Basin and Beyond, SEPM Fieldtrip Guidebook, Corsetti F. A., Ed. (Pacific Section of the SEPM, Fullerton, CA, 2002), pp. 123– 135.
  4. [26]R. Horodyski, Late Proterozoic megafossils from southern Nevada. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstracts with Programs 23, 163 (1991).
  5. [50]W. B. Harland, A Geologic Time Scale (Cambridge University Press, 1982), vol. 1, p. 131.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, L. L., Crowley, J. L., Smith, E. F., Schwartz, D. M., Hodgin, E. B., & Schmitz, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • Boise State University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Lyle L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2023-07-17
Volume
120
Issue
30
Pages
e2301478120-e2301478120
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4384499690
Cited by
50
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Works (Boise State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Science Foundation (EAR-1759200; EAR-1759353; DGE-1746891, EAR-2021064; EAR-2144836)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
Cambrian explosion, Wood Canyon Formation, zircon U-Pb geochronology, carbon isotope stratigraphy, Precambrian-Cambrian boundary
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Isotopes, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Nevada, Wood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review