Cited by 189Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applications

Magnetic resonance microimaging of intraaxonal water diffusion in live excised lamprey spinal cord

Open access
Takahashi, Masaya, Hackney, David B., Zhang, Guixin, Wehrli, Suzanne L., Wright, Alex C., O'Brien, William T., Uematsu, Hidemasa, Wehrli, Felix W. +1 more·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Anisotropy of water diffusion in axon tracts, as determined by diffusion-weighted MRI, has been assumed to reflect the restriction of water diffusion across axon membranes. Reduction in this anisotropy has been interpreted as degeneration of axons. These interpretations are based primarily on a priori reasoning that has had little empirical validation. We used the experimental advantages of the sea lamprey spinal cord, which contains several very large axons, to determine whether intraaxonal diffusion is isotropic and whether anisotropy is attributable to restriction of water mobility by axon surface membranes. Through the application of magnetic resonance microimaging, we were able to measure the purely intraaxonal diffusion characteristics of the giant reticulospinal axons (20–40 μm in diameter). The intraaxonal apparent diffusion coefficients of water parallel (longitudinal ADC, l-ADC) and perpendicular (transverse ADC, t-ADC) to the long axis were 0.98 ± 0.06 (10 −3 mm 2 /sec) and 0.97 ± 0.11 (10 −3 mm 2 /sec), respectively. In white matter regions that included multiple axons, l-ADCs were almost identical regardless of axon density in the sampled axon tract. By comparison, t-ADCs were reduced and varied inversely with the number of axons (and thus axolemmas) in a fixed cross-sectional area. Thus, diffusion was found to be isotropic when measured entirely within a single axon and anisotropic when measured in regions that included multiple axons. These findings support the hypothesis that the cell membrane is the primary source of diffusion anisotropy in fiber tracts of the central nervous system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.252249999

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radial and tangential pathways organization are prominent at 17 weeks but gradually disappear at later gestational ages.

    “Similar studies also show that the radial and tangential pathways organization are prominent at 17 weeks but gradually disappear at later gestational ages, and all major structural pathways are already identifiable by term (Takahashi et al., 2002).”

    From Quantitative mapping of the brain’s structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: A review (2022) · cites this paper as Takahashi et al., 2002

    The Results and Discussion describe diffusion measurements in excised larval sea lamprey spinal cord; no page numbers are available in our copy. Searches for radial and tangential pathways, 17 gestational weeks, and pathways identifiable by term found no passage addressing fetal development. The lamprey findings therefore cannot verify the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All major structural pathways are already identifiable by term.

    “Similar studies also show that the radial and tangential pathways organization are prominent at 17 weeks but gradually disappear at later gestational ages, and all major structural pathways are already identifiable by term (Takahashi et al., 2002).”

    From Quantitative mapping of the brain’s structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: A review (2022) · cites this paper as Takahashi et al., 2002

    The Results describe diffusion imaging of excised larval sea lamprey spinal cords, and the Discussion describes their axonal anatomy. Neither addresses gestational age or whether major structural pathways are identifiable by term. Searches for 17 weeks, radial and tangential pathways, and fetal development found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. [1]Ono J., Harada, K., Takahashi, M., Maeda, M., Ikenaka, K., Sakurai, K., Sakai, N., Kagawa, T., Fritz-Zieroth, B. & Nagai, T. (1995) Brain Res. 671, 141-148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Ono J., Harada, K., Mano, T., Sakurai, K. & Okada, S. (1997) Pediatr. Neurol. 16, 63-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Ford J. C., Hackney, D. B., Alsop, D. C., Jara, H., Joseph, P. M., Hand, C. M. & Black, P. (1994) Magn. Reson. Med. 31, 488-494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Clark C. A., Werring, D. J. & Miller, D. H. (2000) Magn. Reson. Med. 43, 133-138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Mori S., Crain, B. J., Chacko, V. P. & van Zijl, P. C. (1999) Ann. Neurol. 45, 265-269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Makris N., Worth, A. J., Sorensen, A. G., Papadimitriou, G. M., Wu, O., Reese, T. G., Wedeen, V. J., Davis, T. L., Stakes, J. W., Caviness, V. S., et al. (1997) Ann. Neurol. 42, 951-962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Moseley M. E., Kucharczyk, J., Asgari, H. S. & Norman, D. (1991) Magn. Reson. Med. 19, 321-326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Szafer A., Zhong, J. & Gore, J. C. (1995) Magn. Reson. Med. 33, 697-712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]Ford J. C. & Hackney, D. B. (1997) Magn. Reson. Med. 37, 387-394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]Ford J. C., Hackney, D. B., Lavi, E., Phillips, M. & Patel, U. (1998) J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 8, 775-782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]Hsu E. W. (1997) Magn. Reson. Med. 37, 624-627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Grant S. C. (2001) Magn. Reson. Med. 46, 1107-1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Selzer M. E. (1979) Brain Res. 163, 181-193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [14]Lurie D. I. & Selzer, M. E. (1991) J. Comp. Neurol. 306, 409-416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [15]Selzer M. E. (1978) J. Physiol. (London) 277, 395-408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [16]Yin H. S. & Selzer, M. E. (1983) J. Neurosci. 3, 1135-1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [17]Davis G. R., Troxel, M. T., Kohler, V. J., Grossmann, E. M. & McClellan, A. D. (1993) Exp. Brain Res. 97, 83-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [18]Zhang G. & Selzer, M. E. (2001) Exp. Neurol. 167, 304-311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. [19]Wright A. C., Wehrli, S. L., Zhang, G., Takahashi, M., Hackney, D. B., Selzer, M. E. & Wehrli, F. W. (2002) J. Neurosci. Methods 114, 9-15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [20]Mackler S. A. & Selzer, M. E. (1987) J. Physiol. (London) 388, 183-198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [21]Moseley M. E., Cohen, Y., Kucharczyk, J., Mintorovitch, J., Asgari, H. S., Wendland, M. F., Tsuruda, J. & Norman, D. (1990) Radiology (Easton, Pa.) 176, 439-445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [22]Miller A. J. & Joseph, P. M. (1993) Magn. Reson. Imaging 11, 1051-1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [23]Pijak D. S., Hall, G. F., Tenicki, P. J., Boulos, A. S., Lurie, D. I. & Selzer, M. E. (1996) J. Comp. Neurol. 368, 569-581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. [24]Takahashi M., Ono, J., Harada, K., Maeda, M. & Hackney, D. B. (2000) Radiology (Easton, Pa.) 216, 881-885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. [25]Le Bihan D., Turner, R., Douek, P. & Patronas, N. (1992) Am. J. Roentgenol. 159, 591-599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. [26]Beaulieu C. & Allen, P. S. (1996) Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 39-44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. [27]Beaulieu C. & Allen, P. S. (1994) Magn. Reson. Med. 31, 394-400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. [28]Beaulieu C. & Allen, P. S. (1994) Magn. Reson. Med. 32, 579-583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. [29]Niendorf T., Dijkhuizen, R. M., Norris, D. G., van Lookeren Campagne, M. & Nicolay, K. (1996) Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 847-857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. [30]Chin C. L., Wehrli, F. W., Hwang, S. N., Takahashi, M. & Hackney, D. B. (2002) Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 455-460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. [31]Swain G. P., Snedeker, J. A., Ayers, J. & Selzer, M. E. (1993) J. Comp. Neurol. 336, 194-210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, M., Hackney, D. B., Zhang, G., Wehrli, S. L., Wright, A. C., O'Brien, W. T., Uematsu, H., Wehrli, F. W., & Selzer, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine (US)
  • Departments of Radiology and Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 1 Silverstein, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Core Facility, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA; and Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4170 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19131 USA
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-11-25
Volume
99
Issue
25
Pages
16192-16196
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2082853500
Cited by
189
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns025921-08, 5r01ns025581-06)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS 25921, R01 NS 25581, R01 NS 14837, R01 NS4180, R01NS014837)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
diffusion anisotropy, diffusion-weighted imaging, axolemma, apparent diffusion coefficient, axonal degeneration, white matter tracts, giant axons
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Body Water, Cell Membrane, Diffusion, Lampreys, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Spinal Cord

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review