Cited by 1,685Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function

Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning

Open access
Zatorre, Robert J, Fields, R Douglas, Johansen-Berg, Heidi·2012·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Human brain imaging has identified structural changes in gray and white matter that occur with learning. However, ascribing imaging measures to underlying cellular and molecular events is challenging. Here we review human neuroimaging findings of structural plasticity and then discuss cellular and molecular level changes that could underlie observed imaging effects. Greater dialog between researchers in these different fields would help to facilitate cross-talk between cellular and systems level explanations of how learning sculpts brain structure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3045

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human MRI studies show that white matter plasticity is associated with motor learning.

    “Human studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have shown that white matter plasticity is associated with motor learning (Scholz, Klein, Behrens, & Johansen‐Berg, 2009 ; Zatorre, Fields, & Johansen‐Berg, 2012 ).”

    From Motor learning requires myelination to reduce asynchrony and spontaneity in neural activity (2020) · cites this paper as Zatorre, Fields, & Johansen‐Berg, 2012

  • An increasing number of neuroimaging studies have identified alterations of neuroplasticity with MRI.

    “Consistent with the neuroplasticity deficits, an increasing number of neuroimaging studies identified alterations of neuroplasticity with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; Zatorre et al., 2012).”

    From Serotonin and neuroplasticity – Links between molecular, functional and structural pathophysiology in depression (2017) · cites this paper as Zatorre et al., 2012

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Experience can alter white matter microstructure.

    “Indeed, the growing realisation that experience can alter white matter microstructure (Metzler-Baddeley et al., 2017; (McKenzie et al., 2014) Zatorre et al., 2012) highlights the problems of separating cause from effect.”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Zatorre et al., 2012

  • Regional differences in developmental time course are likely to alter regional sensitivity to chemotherapy and its long-term impact.

    “For instance, regional differences in developmental time course (e.g., protracted development of the frontal lobes) (Erus et al., 2015; Zatorre, Fields, & Johansen‐Berg, 2012) are likely to alter regional sensitivity to chemotherapy and its long‐term impact.”

    From Brain structure, working memory and response inhibition in childhood leukemia survivors (2017) · cites this paper as Zatorre, Fields, & Johansen‐Berg, 2012

    The citation is attached to the parenthetical claim about regional developmental timing, including protracted frontal-lobe development; the chemotherapy prediction appears to be the citing authors’ inference. The Longitudinal imaging studies section discusses training-related changes and mentions maturation, but does not establish different developmental time courses across regions. Searches for frontal-lobe developmental timing and chemotherapy found no passage addressing either point (page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zatorre, R. J., Fields, R. D., & Johansen-Berg, H.
Affiliations
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2012-03-18
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
528-536
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2003539800
Cited by
1,685
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 136 · 2018: 146 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 104 · 2012: 22
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (090955)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Keywords
structural plasticity, learning, gray matter, white matter, brain structure, neuroimaging, synaptic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Learning, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurogenesis, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review