Cited by 363Bacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesLight effects on plants

Effect of Visible Light on the Recovery of Streptomyces Griseus Conidia from Ultra-violet Irradiation Injury

Open access
Kelner, Albert·1949·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans the biological, physical, and social sciences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.35.2.73

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The existence of DNA repair mechanisms was independently observed by Kelner and Dulbecco.

    “the existence of repair mechanisms was observed by Kelner [154] and Dulbecco [155] independently.”

    From Molecular Mechanisms of Ultraviolet Radiation‐Induced DNA Damage and Repair (2010) · cites this paper as [154]

    The Discussion reports Kelner’s observation that visible light restored viability to UV-irradiated cells and proposes restoration of an altered cellular constituent as a working hypothesis. It does not identify that constituent as DNA or establish a DNA repair mechanism; it also does not address whether Dulbecco’s observation was independent. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cook, E. V., Radiology, 32, 289 (1939).
  2. Kelner, A., J. Bact., in press (1949).
  3. Kaufmann, B. P., and Gay, H., PROC. NAT. ACAD. Sci., 33, 366-372 (1947).
  4. Brackett, F. S. in Duggar, B. M., Biological Effects of Radiation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1936. 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelner, A.
Affiliations
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Kelner, Albert
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1949-02
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
73-79
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2012084938
Cited by
363
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
29.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
Keywords
Streptomyces griseus, visible light, UV-induced DNA damage, antibiotic-producing actinomycetes
MeSH terms
Actinomyces, Biological Phenomena, Light, Physiological Phenomena, Radiation Injuries, Spores, Fungal, Streptomyces griseus, Viola

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review