The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic variability and effective population size when local extinction and recolonization of subpopulations are frequent
Open accessAbstract
If a population (species) consists of n haploid lines (subpopulations) which reproduce asexually and each of which is subject to random extinction and subsequent replacement, it is shown that, at equilibrium in which mutational production of new alleles and their random extinction balance each other, the genetic diversity (1 minus the sum of squares of allelic frequencies) is given by 2 N e v /(1 + 2 N e v ), where [Formula: see text] in which Ñ is the harmonic mean of the population size per line, n is the number of lines (assumed to be large), λ is the rate of line extinction, and v is the mutation rate (assuming the infinite neutral allele model). In a diploid population (species) consisting of n colonies, if migration takes place between colonies at the rate m (the island model) in addition to extinction and recolonization of colonies, it is shown that effective population size is [Formula: see text] If the rate of colony extinction (λ) is much larger than the migration rate of individuals, the effective population size is greatly reduced compared with the case in which no colony extinctions occur (in which case N e = nÑ ). The stepping-stone type of recolonization scheme is also considered. Bearing of these results on the interpretation of the level of genetic variability at the enzyme level observed in natural populations is discussed from the standpoint of the neutral mutation-random drift hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated
Kimura, M. (1979) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.76.7.3440 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Cited by
Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation
WHITLOCK, M. C. (1999) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672399004127 · Cited by 180
LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM WITH THE ISLAND MODEL
Ohta, T. (1982) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/101.1.139 · Cited by 138
Zeng, T. C., Aw, A. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04375-6 · Cited by 121
Livezey, B. C. (2003) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40168337 · Cited by 81
Local Extinction and Recolonization, Species Effective Population Size, and Modern Human Origins
Eller, E., Hawks, J., & Relethford, J. H. (2009) · Human Biology · doi:10.3378/027.081.0623 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Maruyama, T., & Kimura, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1980-11
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6710-6714
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2084733906
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.