Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Studies on the mechanism of skin tumor promotion: Evidence for several stages in promotion

Open access
Slaga, T. J., Fischer, S. M., Nelson, K., Gleason, G. L.·1980·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The effects of nonpromoting and weakly promoting diterpenes on skin tumor promotion by 12- O -tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA) were investigated. When phorbol and phorbol 12,13-diacetate (both nonpromoting) were given simultaneously with TPA after 7,12-dimethylbenz[ a ]-anthracene (DMBA) initiation in female mice, they had no effect on TPA promotion. However, the nonpromoter 4- O -methyl-TPA and the weak promoter mezerein were found to inhibit TPA promotion in a dose-dependent manner when given simultaneously with TPA. Because mezerein was found to be an effective inhibitor of TPA promotion when given simultaneously and because it induces many biological responses similar to those to TPA, the capacity of mezerein to act as an incomplete promoter in a two-stage promotion protocol was also investigated. Twice-weekly applications of 1,2, or 5 μg of TPA for 2 weeks after DMBA initiation produced 0, 0, and 0.5 papilloma per mouse, respectively, at 20 weeks. When the twice-weekly applications of TPA for 2 weeks were followed by twice-weekly treatments with 2 μg of mezerein for 18 weeks, the number of papillomas per mouse was 2.2, 3.5, and 9.0, respectively. Twice-weekly applications of 2 μg of TPA for 2 weeks followed by twice-weekly treatments with 1, 2, or 4 μg of mezerein for 18 weeks produced 2.1, 3.5, and 6.8 papillomas per mouse, respectively, in DMBA-treated mice. Twice-weekly doses as high as 40 μg of 4- O -methyl-TPA were not effective in producing tumors when given after a limited treatment with TPA; however, 4- O -methyl-TPA had weak activity as a first-stage promoter. The results suggest that although mezerein by itself is a weak promoter and mimics TPA in many biochemical and morphological effects it is a potent second-stage promoter in a two-stage promotion regimen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3659

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Slaga, T. J., Fischer, S. M., Nelson, K., & Gleason, G. L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1980-06
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
3659-3663
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1986270436
Cited by
331
References
0
FWCI
15.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies on the mechanism of skin tumor promotion: Evidence for several stages in promotion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.77.6.3659
The paper
Slaga, T. J., Fischer, S. M., Nelson, K., & Gleason, G. L. (1980). Studies on the mechanism of skin tumor promotion: Evidence for several stages in promotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.77.6.3659

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.