The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision.
Open accessAbstract
For assessing the degree of population subdivision, and therefore the extent to which group selection might favor an altruistic trait, an appropriate measure is Nei's GST, defined by (F0-F)/(1-F). F0 is the probability that two alleles drawn from the same group are identical in state and F is the probability for two alleles drawn at random from the entire population. These probabilities can be assessed from molecular polymorphisms. GST has a number of properties that make it useful for empirical studies. When the mutation rate is small relative to the migration rate and the reciprocal of the group size, GST depends mainly on the absolute number of migrants per generation, moves rapidly to near equilibrium, and is independent of the number of alleles. The relative homogenizing effect of migration in the island and stepping-stone models is not as different as might be expected; one immigrant chosen randomly from the rest of the population is only one to two times as effective as one from a neighboring group, appreciably exceeding 2 only when there are 1000 or more groups. The use of molecular data to estimate the degree of population subdivision may permit testable predictions of the extent of altruistic behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Cited by
Genetic Differentiation and Estimation of Gene Flow from F -Statistics Under Isolation by Distance
Rousset, F. (1997) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/145.4.1219 · Cited by 2,496
G ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation
JOST, L. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03887.x · Cited by 2,435
Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST≠1/(4Nm+1)
Whitlock, M. C., & McCauley, D. E. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960 · Cited by 1,544
Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure.
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0237 · Cited by 1,535
The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers
Balloux, F., & Lugon‐Moulin, N. (2002) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01436.x · Cited by 1,208
Metadata
- Authors
- Crow, J. F., & Aoki, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1984-10
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 6073-6077
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2044477334
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.81.19.6073
- The paper
- Crow, J. F., & Aoki, K. (1984). Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.19.6073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.