Cited by 687RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingRNA modifications and cancer

Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes.

Open access
Kozak, M·1986·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Oligonucleotides designed to create hairpin structures were inserted upstream from the ATG initiator codon in several plasmids that encode preproinsulin, and the effects on translation were monitored in COS cells transfected by the vectors. Creation of a hairpin (delta G = -30 kcal/mol) that directly involves the ATG triplet at the start of the preproinsulin coding sequence does not reduce the yield of proinsulin. However, a more stable stem-and-loop structure (delta G = -50 kcal/mol) reduces the proinsulin yield by 85-95%. The stable hairpin inhibits even when it occurs at the midpoint of the 5' untranslated sequence and thus involves neither the cap nor the ATG codon. Presumably the migrating 40S ribosomal subunit can melt moderately stable duplexes but stalls at structures (delta G = -50 kcal/mol) that resist unfolding. Other experiments argue against the idea that sequestering the 5'-proximal ATG codon in a hairpin structure might allow it to be skipped by ribosomes in favor of an exposed ATG triplet farther downstream: when the primary sequence around the first ATG triplet is favorable for initiation, no translation from a downstream site can be detected, irrespective of whether the first ATG codon is single-stranded or base-paired.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.83.9.2850

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The paper's data captured and quantitated the repressive effect of secondary structure on ribosome load.

    “By calculating UTR minimum free energies (MFE)26 and comparing them to UTR MRLs, we captured and quantitated this repressive effect of secondary structure on ribosome load (Supplementary Fig. 2c)17,25.”

    From Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

    The paper reports that highly stable 5′-UTR hairpins inhibit translation by 85–95%, supporting a repressive effect of secondary structure under those conditions. It does not report quantifying ribosome load; the Discussion instead distinguishes inhibition of translation from initial 40S-subunit binding. The citing authors’ calculation of MFE and comparison with ribosome load are their own analysis, not a measurement in this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Efficient translation initiation in mammalian species depends mainly on the secondary structure that may embed the Kozak consensus to obscure essential translation initiation signals.

    “Efficient translation initiation in mammalian species depends mainly on two factors [40,41]: (1) the Kozak consensus [42,43,44], and (2) the secondary structure that may embed the Kozak consensus to obscure these essential translation initiation signals [9,41,45].”

    From Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines (2021) · cites this paper as [45]

    The study description reports that a very stable hairpin inhibits translation, supporting a role for secondary structure. But the Discussion says moderately stable hairpins often have no effect and argues against the proposed mechanism of hiding an upstream start codon. It also identifies the cap and sequences flanking the ATG codon as other regulators, so this paper does not establish that initiation depends mainly on the two stated factors or that secondary structure inhibits it by obscuring the Kozak consensus. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Translation initiation and elongation is affected by RNA secondary structure that forms within 5′ UTRs and coding sequences, with strong structures showing the most negative effect on translation.

    “Translation initiation and elongation is also affected by RNA secondary structure that forms within 5′ UTRs and coding sequences, with strong structures showing the most negative effect on translation17,25.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Privalsky, M. L. & Bishop, J. M. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 3958–3962.
  2. [19]Nomoto, A., Omata, T., Toyoda, H., Kuge, S., Horie, H., Kataoka, Y., Genba, Y., Nakano, Y. & Imura, N. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 5793–5797.
  3. [29]Saito, H., Hayday, A. C., Wiman, K., Hayward, W. S. & Tonegawa, S. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 7476-7480.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kozak, M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kozak, M
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1986-05
Volume
83
Issue
9
Pages
2850-2854
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2072971665
Cited by
687
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 33915)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
mRNA secondary structure, translation initiation, ribosome scanning, hairpin structure, stem-loop structure, preproinsulin, 5' untranslated region, 40S ribosomal subunit, ribosome stalling
MeSH terms
Base Composition, Codon, Insulin, Mutation, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Proinsulin, Protein Precursors, Ribosomes, RNA, Messenger, Protein Biosynthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review