Cited by 201Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Circular RNAs: relics of precellular evolution?

Open access
Diener, T O·1989·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The demonstration of enzymatic capabilities of certain RNAs, in addition to their well-known template properties, has led to the recognition that RNAs are the only biological macromolecules that can function both as genotype and phenotype, hence raising the possibility of Darwinian selection and precellular evolution at the RNA level in the absence of DNA or protein. Recent models of such precellular RNA systems are patterned after the properties of intron-derived ribozymes. On the basis of a phylogenetic analysis and known properties of certain small plant pathogenic RNAs (viroids and viroid-like satellite RNAs), I suggest that these plant RNAs are more plausible candidates than introns as "living fossils" of a precellular RNA world. Their small size and circularity would have enhanced probability of their survival in error-prone, primitive self-replicating RNA systems and assured complete replication without the need for initiation or termination signals. All of these RNAs possess efficient mechanisms for the precise cleavage of monomers from oligomeric replication intermediates. Some (most viroids) require a host factor, but others (viroid-like satellite RNAs and one viroid) function as self-cleaving RNA enzymes far smaller and simpler than those derived from introns. The question is raised whether introns could have evolved from viroids or viroid-like satellite RNAs rather than vice versa, as has been widely speculated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9370

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diener, T. O.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Diener, T O
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1989-12
Volume
86
Issue
23
Pages
9370-9374
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2117532518
Cited by
201
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
circular RNA, RNA world, viroids, intron evolution, self-cleaving ribozymes, RNA replication, origin of life, phylogenetic analysis
MeSH terms
RNA, Circular, Base Sequence, DNA Transposable Elements, Biological Evolution, Genes, Introns, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, RNA Splicing, RNA, Ribosomal, Viroids, RNA, Catalytic, RNA, Satellite

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review