The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feedforward excitation of the hippocampus by afferents from the entorhinal cortex: redefinition of the role of the trisynaptic pathway.
Open accessAbstract
For the past 3 decades, functional characterizations of the hippocampus have emphasized its intrinsic trisynaptic circuitry, which consists of successive excitatory projections from the entorhinal cortex to the dentate gyrus, from granule cells of the dentate to the CA3/4 pyramidal cell region, and from CA3/4 to the CA1/2 pyramidal cell region. Despite unequivocal anatomical evidence for a monosynaptic projection from entorhinal to CA3 and CA1/2, few in vivo electrophysiological studies of the direct pathway have been reported. In the experiments presented here, we stimulated axons of entorhinal cortical neurons in vivo and recorded evoked single unit and population spike responses in the dentate, CA3, and CA1 of hippocampus, to determine if pyramidal cells are driven primarily via the monosynaptic or trisynaptic pathways. Our results show that neurons within the three subfields of the hippocampus discharge simultaneously in response to input from a given subpopulation of entorhinal cortical neurons and that the initial monosynaptic excitation of pyramidal cells then is followed by weaker excitatory volleys transmitted through the trisynaptic pathway. In addition, we found that responses of CA3 pyramidal cells often precede those of dentate granule cells and that excitation of CA3 and CA1 pyramidal cells can occur in the absence of granule cell excitation. In total, these results argue for a different conceptualization of the functional organization of the hippocampus with respect to the propagation of activity through its intrinsic pathways: input from the entorhinal cortex initiates a two-phase feedforward excitation of pyramidal cells, with the dentate gyrus providing feedforward excitation of CA3, and with both the dentate and CA3 providing feedforward excitation of CA1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interneurons of the hippocampus
Freund, T. F., & Buzsáki, G. (1998) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1996)6:4<347::aid-hipo1>3.0.co;2-i · Cited by 3,441
Relating Hippocampal Circuitry to Function
Lisman, J. E. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81085-5 · Cited by 607
Place cells and place recognition maintained by direct entorhinal-hippocampal circuitry
Brun, V. H., Otnæss, M. K., Molden, S., Steffenach, H.-A., Witter, M. P., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1071089 · Cited by 606
Dentate gyrus circuits for encoding, retrieval and discrimination of episodic memories
Hainmueller, T., & Bartos, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0260-z · Cited by 506
Theta Phase Segregation of Input-Specific Gamma Patterns in Entorhinal-Hippocampal Networks
Schomburg, E. W., Fernández-Ruiz, A., Mizuseki, K., Berényi, A., Anastassiou, C. A., Koch, C., & Buzsáki, G. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.051 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeckel, M. F., & Berger, T. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5832-5836
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2010928535
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feedforward excitation of the hippocampus by afferents from the entorhinal cortex: redefinition of the role of the trisynaptic pathway. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.15.5832
- The paper
- Yeckel, M. F., & Berger, T. W. (1990). Feedforward excitation of the hippocampus by afferents from the entorhinal cortex: redefinition of the role of the trisynaptic pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.15.5832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.