The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymerase chain reaction-aided genomic sequencing of an X chromosome-linked CpG island: methylation patterns suggest clonal inheritance, CpG site autonomy, and an explanation of activity state stability.
Open accessAbstract
The 5' region of the gene encoding human X chromosome-linked phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) is a promoter-containing CpG island known to be methylated at 119 of 121 CpG dinucleotides in a 450-base-pair region on the inactive human X chromosome in the hamster-human cell line X8-6T2. Here we report the use of polymerase chain reaction-aided genomic sequencing to determine the complete methylation pattern of this region in clones derived from X8-6T2 cells after treatment with the methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine. We find (i) a clone showing full expression of human phosphoglycerate kinase is fully unmethylated in this region; (ii) clones not expressing human phosphoglycerate kinase remain methylated at approximately 50% of CpG sites, with a pattern of interspersed methylated (M) and unmethylated (U) sites different for each clone; (iii) singles, defined as M-U-M or U-M-U, are common; and (iv) a few CpG sites are partially methylated. The data are interpreted according to a model of multiple, autonomous CpG sites, and estimates are made for two key parameters, maintenance efficiency (Em approximately 99.9% per site per generation) and de novo methylation efficiency (Ed approximately 5%). These parameter values and the hypothesis that several independent sites must be unmethylated for transcription can explain the stable maintenance of X chromosome inactivation. We also consider how the active region is kept free of methylation and suggest that transcription inhibits methylation by decreasing Em so that methylation cannot be maintained. Thus, multiple CpG sites, independent with respect to a dynamic methylation system, can stabilize two alternative states of methylation and transcription.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Church, G. M., & Gilbert, W. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991 · Cited by 8,116
CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation
Bird, A. P. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321209a0 · Cited by 3,777
DNA Methylation and Gene Function
Razin, A., & Riggs, A. D. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6254144 · Cited by 2,071
Self-citationHolliday, R., & Pugh, J. E. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.187.4173.226 · Cited by 1,972
X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation
Riggs, A. D. (1975) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000130315 · Cited by 1,342
Self-citationDNA METHYLATION AND GENE ACTIVITY
Doerfler, W. (1983) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.000521 · Cited by 1,098
The Inheritance of Epigenetic Defects
Holliday, R. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3310230 · Cited by 1,082
In Vivo Footprinting of a Muscle Specific Enhancer by Ligation Mediated PCR
Mueller, P. R., & Wold, B. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2814500 · Cited by 944
DNA methylation and gene activity
Cedar, H. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90479-5 · Cited by 886
Creusot, F., Acs, G., & Christman, J. K. (1982) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)68144-5 · Cited by 564
Cited by
DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory
Bird, A. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.947102 · Cited by 7,124
Gene Silencing in Cancer in Association with Promoter Hypermethylation
Herman, J. G., & Baylin, S. B. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra023075 · Cited by 3,422
Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes
Kærn, M., Elston, T. C., Blake, W. J., & Collins, J. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1615 · Cited by 2,320
Maternal Methyl Supplements in Mice Affect Epigenetic Variation and DNA Methylation of Offspring
Cooney, C. A., Dave, A. A., & Wolff, G. L. (2002) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/132.8.2393s · Cited by 784
DNA methylation and gene expression
Razin, A., & Cedar, H. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.55.3.451-458.1991 · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfeifer, G. P., Steigerwald, S. D., Hansen, R. S., Gartler, S. M., & Riggs, A. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 8252-8256
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2126943822
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymerase chain reaction-aided genomic sequencing of an X chromosome-linked CpG island: methylation patterns suggest clonal inheritance, CpG site autonomy, and an explanation of activity state stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.21.8252
- The paper
- Pfeifer, G. P., Steigerwald, S. D., Hansen, R. S., Gartler, S. M., & Riggs, A. D. (1990). Polymerase chain reaction-aided genomic sequencing of an X chromosome-linked CpG island: methylation patterns suggest clonal inheritance, CpG site autonomy, and an explanation of activity state stability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.21.8252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.