The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The NO hypothesis: possible effects of a short-lived, rapidly diffusible signal in the development and function of the nervous system.
Open accessAbstract
Several observations suggest that the Ca2(+)-dependent postsynaptic release of nitric oxide (NO) may be important in the formation and function of the vertebrate nervous system. We explore here the hypothesis that the release of NO and its subsequent diffusion may be critically related to three aspects of nervous system function: (i) synaptic plasticity and long-term potentiation in certain regions of the adult nervous system, (ii) the control of cerebral blood flow in such regions, and (iii) the establishment and activity-dependent refinement of axonal projections during the later stages of development. In this paper, we detail and analyze the basic assumptions underlying this NO hypothesis and describe a computer simulation of a minimal version of the hypothesis. In the simulation, a 3-dimensional volume of neuropil is presented with patterned afferent input; NO is produced, diffuses, and is destroyed; and synaptic strengths are determined by a set of synaptic rules based on the correlation of synaptic depolarization and NO levels. According to the hypothesis, voltage-dependent postsynaptic release of this rapidly diffusing substance links the activities of neurons in a local volume of tissue, regardless of whether the neurons are directly connected by synapses. This property is demonstrated in the simulation, and it is this property that is exploited in the hypothesis to account for certain aspects of long-term potentiation and activity-dependent sharpening of axonal arbors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Morris, R. G. M., Anderson, E., Lynch, G. S., & Baudry, M. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/319774a0 · Cited by 3,640
Intracellular injections of EGTA block induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation
Lynch, G., Larson, J., Kelso, S., Barrionuevo, G., & Schottler, F. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/305719a0 · Cited by 1,116
Cited by
Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease
Pacher, P., Beckman, J. S., & Liaudet, L. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2006 · Cited by 6,390
Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly
Beckman, J. S., & Koppenol, W. H. (1996) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.5.c1424 · Cited by 5,513
A novel neuronal messenger molecule in brain: The free radical, nitric oxide
Dawson, T. M., Dawson, V. L., & Snyder, S. H. (1992) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410320302 · Cited by 834
Simulation of the diffusion and reaction of endogenously produced nitric oxide.
Lancaster, J. R. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.17.8137 · Cited by 698
Neural Darwinism: selection and reentrant signaling in higher brain function.
Edelman, G. M. (1993) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(93)90304-a · Cited by 557
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gally, J. A., Montague, P. R., Reeke, G. N., & Edelman, G. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3547-3551
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2051106202
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The NO hypothesis: possible effects of a short-lived, rapidly diffusible signal in the development and function of the nervous system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.9.3547
- The paper
- Gally, J. A., Montague, P. R., Reeke, G. N., & Edelman, G. M. (1990). The NO hypothesis: possible effects of a short-lived, rapidly diffusible signal in the development and function of the nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.9.3547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.