The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review).
Open accessAbstract
Darwinian theory has yet to explain adequately the fact of sex. If males provide little or no aid to offspring, a high (up to 2-fold) extra average fitness has to emerge as a property of a sexual parentage if sex is to be stable. The advantage must presumably come from recombination but has been hard to identify. It may well lie in the necessity to recombine defenses to defeat numerous parasites. A model demonstrating this works best for contesting hosts whose defense polymorphisms are constrained to low mutation rates. A review of the literature shows that the predictions of parasite coevolution fit well with the known ecology of sex. Moreover, parasite coevolution is superior to previous models of the evolution of sex by supporting the stability of sex under the following challenging conditions: very low fecundity, realistic patterns of genotype fitness and changing environment, and frequent mutation to parthenogenesis, even while sex pays the full 2-fold cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pathogens, polymorphism, and the evolution of sex
Tooby, J. (1982) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90358-7 · Cited by 260
Cited by
Adaptive evolution of highly mutable loci in pathogenic bacteria
Moxon, E. R., Rainey, P. B., Nowak, M. A., & Lenski, R. E. (1994) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00005-1 · Cited by 755
The evolutionary genetics of personality
Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.629 · Cited by 610
The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence.
Geary, D. C. (2005) · doi:10.1037/10871-000 · Cited by 551
Dybdahl, M. F., & Lively, C. M. (1998) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01833.x · Cited by 353
The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent
Loewe, L., & Hill, W. G. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0317 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R., & Tanese, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3566-3573
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1987772873
- Cited by
- 1,276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566
- The paper
- Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R., & Tanese, R. (1990). Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.