The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two distinct mechanisms alter p53 in breast cancer: mutation and nuclear exclusion.
Open accessAbstract
Twenty-seven cases of inflammatory breast cancer were screened for the presence of the p53 protein by immunocytochemical methods using a monoclonal antibody directed against the p53 protein. Three groups were detected: 8 cases (30%) had high levels of p53 in the nucleus of the cancer cells; 9 cases (33%) had a complete lack of detectable staining; 10 cases (37%) showed a pattern of cytoplasmic staining with nuclear sparing. Nucleotide sequence analysis of p53 cDNAs derived from the samples with cytoplasmic staining revealed only wild-type p53 alleles in 6 out of 7 cases. An eighth case was determined to be wild type by a single-strand conformation polymorphism. In contrast, the samples containing nuclear p53 contained a variety of missense mutations and a nonsense mutation. The p53 cDNAs from 3 of the tumors that lacked detectable p53 staining were analyzed, and all 3 had wild-type nucleotide sequences. Interestingly, a case of normal lactating breast tissue also showed intense cytoplasmic staining for p53 with nuclear sparing. These data suggest that some breast cancers that contain the wild-type form of p53 protein may inactivate its tumor-suppressing activity by sequestering this protein in the cytoplasm, away from its site of action in the cell nucleus. The detection of cytoplasmic p53 in normal lactating breast tissue could suggest that this is the mechanism employed in specific physiological situations to permit transient cell proliferation. This observation could explain how some breast cancer tissues inactivate p53 function without mutation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“constitutive-cytoplasmic sequestration of p53 occurs in inflammatory breast cancer,11,12 neuroblastoma,13 retinoblastoma and some colon carcinomas14 and correlates with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy.”
From Stress-mediated nuclear stabilization of p53 is regulated by ubiquitination and importin-α3 binding (2010) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
p53 Mutations in Human Cancers
Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., & Harris, C. C. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1905840 · Cited by 8,018
The p53 proto-oncogene can act as a suppressor of transformation
Finlay, C. A., Hinds, P. W., & Levine, A. J. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90045-7 · Cited by 1,987
Self-citationShaulsky, G., Goldfinger, N., Ben-Ze'ev, A., & Rotter, V (1990) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.10.12.6565 · Cited by 356
Cited by
The complexity of p53 modulation: emerging patterns from divergent signals
Giaccia, A. J., & Kastan, M. B. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.19.2973 · Cited by 1,314
Stommel, J. M., Marchenko, N. D., Jimenez, G. S., Moll, U. M., Hope, T. J., & Wahl, G. M. (1999) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/18.6.1660 · Cited by 738
Self-citationA Proinflammatory Cytokine Inhibits P53 Tumor Suppressor Activity
Hudson, J. D., Shoaibi, M. A., Maestro, R., Carnero, A., Hannon, G. J., & Beach, D. H. (1999) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.190.10.1375 · Cited by 649
MDMX: a novel p53‐binding protein with some functional properties of MDM2.
Shvarts, A., Steegenga, W. T., Riteco, N., van Laar, T., Dekker, P., Bazuine, M., van Ham, R. C., van der Houven van Oordt, W., Hateboer, G., van der Eb, A. J., et al. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00919.x · Cited by 648
The mitochondrial pathways of apoptosis
Estaquier, J., Vallette, F., Vayssiere, J.-L., & Mignotte, B. (2012) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2869-1_7 · Cited by 637
Metadata
- Authors
- Moll, U. M., Riou, G., & Levine, A. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 7262-7266
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1997646834
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two distinct mechanisms alter p53 in breast cancer: mutation and nuclear exclusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.15.7262
- The paper
- Moll, U. M., Riou, G., & Levine, A. J. (1992). Two distinct mechanisms alter p53 in breast cancer: mutation and nuclear exclusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.15.7262
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.