Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,837

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wild-type p53 is a cell cycle checkpoint determinant following irradiation.

Open access
Kuerbitz, S J, Plunkett, B S, Walsh, W V, Kastan, M B·1992·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Cell cycle checkpoints appear to contribute to an increase in cell survival and a decrease in abnormal heritable genetic changes following exposure to DNA damaging agents. Though several radiation-sensitive yeast mutants have been identified, little is known about the genes that control these responses in mammalian cells. Recent studies from our laboratory have demonstrated a close correlation between expression of wild-type p53 genes in human hematopoietic cells and their ability to arrest in G1 phase after certain types of DNA damage. In the present study, this correlation was first generalized to nonhematopoietic mammalian cells as well. A cause and effect relationship between expression of wild-type p53 and the G1 arrest that occurs after gamma irradiation was then established by demonstrating (i) acquisition of the G1 arrest after gamma irradiation following transfection of wild-type p53 genes into cells lacking endogenous p53 genes and (ii) loss of the G1 arrest after irradiation following transfection of mutant p53 genes into cells with wild-type endogenous p53 genes. A defined role for p53 (the most commonly mutated gene in human cancers) in a physiologic pathway has, to our knowledge, not been reported previously. Furthermore, these experiments illustrate one way in which a mutant p53 gene product can function in a "dominant negative" manner. Participation of p53 in this pathway suggests a mechanism for the contribution of abnormalities in p53 to tumorigenesis and genetic instability and provides a useful model for studies of the molecular mechanisms of p53 involvement in controlling the cell cycle.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7491

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,837

Metadata

Authors
Kuerbitz, S. J., Plunkett, B. S., Walsh, W. V., & Kastan, M. B.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1992-08-15
Volume
89
Issue
16
Pages
7491-7495
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2030283142
Cited by
1,837
References
2
FWCI
67.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wild-type p53 is a cell cycle checkpoint determinant following irradiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.16.7491
The paper
Kuerbitz, S. J., Plunkett, B. S., Walsh, W. V., & Kastan, M. B. (1992). Wild-type p53 is a cell cycle checkpoint determinant following irradiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.16.7491

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.