The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dopamine receptor subtypes colocalize in rat striatonigral neurons.
Open accessAbstract
Dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra provide one of the major neuromodulatory inputs to the neostriatum. Recent in situ hybridization experiments have suggested that postsynaptic dopamine receptors are segregated in striatonigral and striatopallidal neurons. We have tested this hypothesis in acutely isolated, retrogradely labeled striatonigral neurons by examining the neuromodulatory effects of selective dopaminergic agonists on Na currents and by probing single-cell antisense RNA populations with dopamine receptor cDNAs. In most of the neurons examined (20/31), the application of the D1 dopamine receptor agonist SKF 38393 reduced evoked whole-cell Na+ current. The D2 agonists quinpirole and bromocriptine had mixed effects; in most neurons (23/42), whole-cell Na+ currents were reduced, but in others (8/42), currents were increased. In cell-attached patch recordings, bath application of SKF 38393 decreased currents as in whole-cell recordings, whereas quinpirole consistently (6/10) enhanced currents--suggesting that D2-like receptors could act through membrane delimited and non-delimited pathways. Changes in evoked current were produced by modulation of peak conductance and modest shifts in the voltage dependence of steady-state inactivation. Antisense RNA probes of dopamine receptor cDNA Southern blots consistently (5/5) revealed the presence of D1, D2, and D3 receptor mRNA in single striatonigral neurons. These findings argue that, contrary to a strict receptor segregation hypothesis, many striatonigral neurons colocalize functional D1, D2, and D3 receptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B., & Sigworth, F. J. (1981) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00656997 · Cited by 18,436
Cited by
Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons
Schultz, W. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1 · Cited by 4,564
Dopamine receptors: from structure to function
MISSALE, C., NASH, S. R., ROBINSON, S. W., JABER, M., & CARON, M. G. (1998) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.189 · Cited by 3,633
Surmeier, D. J., Ding, J., Day, M., Wang, Z., & Shen, W. (2007) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.008 · Cited by 1,203
Self-citationDopamine and the regulation of cognition and attention
Nieoullon, A. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00011-4 · Cited by 1,131
Cortico-Basal Ganglia Reward Network: Microcircuitry
Sesack, S. R., & Grace, A. A. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.93 · Cited by 985
Metadata
- Authors
- Surmeier, D. J., Eberwine, J., Wilson, C. J., Cao, Y., Stefani, A., & Kitai, S. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 10178-10182
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2155599139
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dopamine receptor subtypes colocalize in rat striatonigral neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.89.21.10178
- The paper
- Surmeier, D. J., Eberwine, J., Wilson, C. J., Cao, Y., Stefani, A., & Kitai, S. T. (1992). Dopamine receptor subtypes colocalize in rat striatonigral neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.21.10178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.