Cited by 1,203Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

D1 and D2 dopamine-receptor modulation of striatal glutamatergic signaling in striatal medium spiny neurons

Surmeier, D. James, Ding, Jun, Day, Michelle, Wang, Zhongfeng, Shen, Weixing·2007·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Dopamine shapes a wide variety of psychomotor functions. This is mainly accomplished by modulating cortical and thalamic glutamatergic signals impinging upon principal medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the striatum. Several lines of evidence suggest that dopamine D1 receptor signaling enhances dendritic excitability and glutamatergic signaling in striatonigral MSNs, whereas D2 receptor signaling exerts the opposite effect in striatopallidal MSNs. The functional antagonism between these two major striatal dopamine receptors extends to the regulation of synaptic plasticity. Recent studies, using transgenic mice in which cells express D1 and D2 receptors, have uncovered unappreciated differences between MSNs that shape glutamatergic signaling and the influence of DA on synaptic plasticity. These studies have also shown that long-term alterations in dopamine signaling produce profound and cell-type-specific reshaping of corticostriatal connectivity and function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.008

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interaction between glutamate and striatal activity serves as an important modulator of synaptic plasticity and neural excitability.

    “It is believed that the interaction between glutamate and striatal activity serves as an important modulator of synaptic plasticity and neural excitability (Surmeier et al., 2007; Kreitzer et al., 2009; Lovinger et al., 2010; Gleich et al., 2015).”

    From Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as Surmeier et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Surmeier, D. J., Ding, J., Day, M., Wang, Z., & Shen, W.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Surmeier, D. James
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
228-235
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167021628
Cited by
1,203
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 74
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 34696)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, striatum, medium spiny neurons, glutamatergic signaling, striatonigral neurons, striatopallidal neurons, dendritic excitability, synaptic plasticity, corticostriatal connectivity, dopamine signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Glutamine, Humans, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Signal Transduction, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Receptors, Dopamine D2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review