Cited by 1,017Insect symbiosis and bacterial influencesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Accelerated evolution and Muller’s Rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria

Open access
Moran, N A·1996·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Many bacteria live only within animal cells and infect hosts through cytoplasmic inheritance. These endosymbiotic lineages show distinctive population structure, with small population size and effectively no recombination. As a result, endosymbionts are expected to accumulate mildly deleterious mutations. If these constitute a substantial proportion of new mutations, endosymbionts will show (i) faster sequence evolution and (ii) a possible shift in base composition reflecting mutational bias. Analyses of 16S rDNA of five independently derived endosymbiont clades show, in every case, faster evolution in endosymbionts than in free-living relatives. For aphid endosymbionts (genus Buchnera), coding genes exhibit accelerated evolution and unusually low ratios of synonymous to nonsynonymous substitutions compared to ratios for the same genes for enterics. This concentration of the rate increase in nonsynonymous substitutions is expected under the hypothesis of increased fixation of deleterious mutations. Polypeptides for all Buchnera genes analyzed have accumulated amino acids with codon families rich in A+T, supporting the hypothesis that substitutions are deleterious in terms of polypeptide function. These observations are best explained as the result of Muller's ratchet within small asexual populations, combined with mutational bias. In light of this explanation, two observations reported earlier for Buchnera, the apparent loss of a repair gene and the overproduction of a chaperonin, may reflect compensatory evolution. An alternative hypothesis, involving selection on genomic base composition, is contradicted by the observation that the speedup is concentrated at nonsynonymous sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relaxed selection has been implicated as both a driver of speciation and a precursor to extinction.

    “Relaxed selection has also been implicated as both a driver of speciation (Templeton 2008) and a precursor to extinction (Moran 1996).”

    From RELAX: Detecting Relaxed Selection in a Phylogenetic Framework (2015) · cites this paper as Moran 1996

  • The effective population size of bacterial endosymbionts is smaller than that of their free-living relatives, partially due to the transmission bottleneck across insect generations.

    “The effective population size of bacterial endosymbionts is smaller than that of their free-living relatives, partially due to the transmission bottleneck across insect generations (Moran 1996;Funk et al. 2001;Herbeck et al. 2003).”

    From RELAX: Detecting Relaxed Selection in a Phylogenetic Framework (2015) · cites this paper as Moran 1996

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1]Kimura, M. (1983) The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York).
  2. [9]Ochman, H. & Wilson, A. C. (1987) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, ed. Neidhardt, F. (Am. Soc. for Microbiol., Washington, DC), pp. 1649-1654.
  3. [11]Selander, R. K., Caugant, D. A. & Whittam, T. S. (1987) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, ed. Neidhardt, F. (Am. Soc. for Microbiol., Washington, DC), pp. 1625–1648.
  4. [25]Moran, N. A., Munson, M. A., Baumann, P. & Ishikawa, H. (1993) Proc. R. Soc. London B. 253, 167–171.
  5. [32]Wu, C.-I. & Li, W.-H. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 1741-1745.
  6. [36]Lai, C.-Y., Baumann, P. & Baumann, L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 3819–3823.
  7. [38]Heie, O. E. (1987) in World Crop Pests, Aphids, eds. Minks, A. K. & Harrewijn, P. (Elsevier, Amsterdam), Vol. 2A, pp. 367–391.
  8. [41]O'Neill, S. L., Giordano, R., Colbert, A., Karr, T. L. & Robertson, H. M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 2699–2702.
  9. [50]Muto, A. & Osawa, S. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 166-169.
  10. [52]Sueoka, N. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2653–2657.
  11. [51]Sueoka, N. (1961) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 47, 1141–1149.
  12. [53]Sharp, P. M. (1989) in Evolution and Animal Breeding, eds. Hill, W. G. & MacKay, T. F. C. (CAB, London), pp. 23–32.
  13. [58]Swanson, W. J. & Vacquier, V. D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 4957–4961.
  14. [61]Riley, M. & Krawiec, S. (1987) in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, ed. Neidhardt, F. (Am. Soc. for Microbiol., Washington, DC), pp. 967–981.
  15. [63]Kimura, M. (1989) in Evolution and Animal Breeding, eds. Hill, W. G. & MacKay, T. F. C. (CAB, London), pp. 13–16.
  16. [66]Gillham, N. W. (1994) Organelle Genes and Genomes (Oxford Univ. Press, New York), pp. 92–108.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moran, N. A.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Moran, N A
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1996-04-02
Volume
93
Issue
7
Pages
2873-2878
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1968179480
Cited by
1,017
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 33
FWCI
39.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Muller's ratchet, endosymbiotic bacteria, Buchnera, aphid endosymbionts, deleterious mutation accumulation, mutational bias, nonsynonymous substitution rate, synonymous substitution rate, cytoplasmic inheritance, asexual populations, compensatory evolution, 16S rRNA gene, nucleotide composition
MeSH terms
Animals, Aphids, Codon, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Escherichia coli, Biological Evolution, Insecta, Lactobacillus, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Salmonella typhimurium, Symbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review