Cited by 176Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Human olfaction: from genomic variation to phenotypic diversity

Hasin-Brumshtein, Yehudit, Lancet, Doron, Olender, Tsviya·2009·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

The sense of smell is a complex molecular device, encompassing several hundred olfactory receptor proteins (ORs). These receptors, encoded by the largest human gene superfamily, integrate odorant signals into an accurate 'odor image' in the brain. Widespread phenotypic diversity in human olfaction is, in part, attributable to prevalent genetic variation in OR genes, owing to copy number variation, deletion alleles and deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms. The development of new genomic tools, including next generation sequencing and CNV assays, provides opportunities to characterize the genetic variations of this system. The advent of large-scale functional screens of expressed ORs, combined with genetic association studies, has the potential to link variations in ORs to human chemosensory phenotypes. This promises to provide a genome-wide view of human olfaction, resulting in a deeper understanding of personalized odor coding, with the potential to decipher flavor and fragrance preferences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2009.02.002

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with a recent individual-genome survey, the set had a similar deletion size distribution but different size distributions for other structural-variant classes, reflecting ascertainment differences.

    “we also compared our set to a recent survey of SVs in an individual genome37 based on capillary sequencing and array-based analyses24, and observed a similar size distribution for deletions, but differences in the size distributions of other SV classes, reflecting underlying differences in SV ascertainment”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasin-Brumshtein, Y., Lancet, D., & Olender, T.
Affiliations
Crown Human Genome Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Lancet, Doron
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
178-184
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035403293
Cited by
176
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
human olfaction, olfactory receptor genes, copy number variation, single nucleotide polymorphisms, deletion alleles, olfaction, genetic association studies
MeSH terms
Alleles, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Polymorphism, Genetic, Smell, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Receptors, Odorant, Gene Dosage, Evolution, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review