Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The p75 nerve growth factor receptor mediates survival or death depending on the stage of sensory neuron development.

Open access
Barrett, G L, Bartlett, P F·1994·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The function of the low-affinity nerve growth factor (NGF) receptor, p75NGFR, in regulating neuronal survival during development is unclear. The sensory deficit in mice with mutated p75NGFR suggests it is necessary for development of sensory neurons; however, whether it is required, in addition to trkA, for signal transduction or is more involved in localization of NGF is unresolved. In this study we demonstrate, in vitro, that lowering the levels of p75NGFR expression in sensory neurons with antisense oligonucleotides largely prevents the NGF-mediated survival of sensory neurons from embryonic day 12 and 15 mice but increases the survival of embryonic day 19 and postnatal day 2 sensory neurons in the absence of NGF. Thus, the p75NGFR is required for NGF-mediated survival in neurons at the stage of target innervation but can mediate an apoptotic signal at a later stage of cell development. Thus, p75NGFR undergoes a switch in function in the perinatal period: during embryogenesis it is required, probably with trkA, to mediate neuronal survival in the presence of NGF, but in the early postnatal period it acts as a constitutive death signal in the absence of NGF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6501

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, G. L., & Bartlett, P. F.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1994-07-05
Volume
91
Issue
14
Pages
6501-6505
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1996708582
Cited by
370
References
0
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.