Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCancer Cells and MetastasisMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Model study detecting breast cancer cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells at frequencies as low as 10(-7).

Open access
Gross, H J, Verwer, B, Houck, D, Hoffman, R A, Recktenwald, D·1995·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A flow cytometric assay was developed to detect rare cancer cells in blood and bone marrow. Multiple markers; each identified by a separate color of immunofluorescence (yellow and two shades of red), are used to reliably identify the cancer cells. Blood or bone marrow cells, which are not of interest but interfere in detecting the cancer cells, are identified by a panel of immunofluorescence markers, each of which has the same color (green). Thus, the rare cancer cells of interest are yellow and two different shades of red but not green. The requirement that the rare cancer cell be simultaneously positive for three separate colors (the specific markers) and negative for a fourth color (the exclusion color) allowed detection of as few as one cancer cell in 10(7) nucleated blood cells (a frequency of 10(-7). To test this rare-event assay prior to clinical studies, a model study was performed in which the clinical sample was simulated by mixing small numbers of cells from the breast carcinoma line BT-20 with peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We detected statistically significant numbers of BT-20 cells at mixing frequencies of 10(-5), 10(-6), and 10(-7). In control samples, no target events (BT-20) were observed when more than 10(8) cells were analyzed. For additional confirmation that the BT-20 cells in the model study were correctly identified and counted, the BT-20 cells (and only BT-20 cells) were covalently stained with a fifth fluorescence dye, 7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin (CMAC). CMAC fluorescence data were not used in the assay for detecting BT-20 cells. Only after the analysis using data from the specific and exclusion colors had been completed were the events identified as BT-20 cells checked for CMAC fluorescence. The putative BT-20 events were always found to be positive for CMAC fluorescence, which further increases confidence in the assay. Manual data analysis and an automated computer program were compared. Results were comparable with the manual and automated methods, but the automated "genetic algorithm" always found more BT-20 events. Cell sorting of BT-20 cells from samples that contained BT-20 at frequencies of 10(-5), 10(-6), and 10(-7) provided further evidence that these rare cells could be reliably detected. The good performance of the assay with the model system will encourage further studies on clinical samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.92.2.537

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Ramaekers, F. C., Vooijs, S. G. P. & Smedts, F. (1992) in Current Perspectives on Molecular and Ċellular Oncology, ed. Spandidos, D. (JAI, London) Vol. 1, pp. 285–318.

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Gross, H. J., Verwer, B., Houck, D., Hoffman, R. A., & Recktenwald, D.
Affiliations
Becton Dickinson (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1995-01-17
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
537-541
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2056777828
Cited by
198
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Keywords
breast cancer, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, flow cytometry, genetic algorithm, cell sorting, bone marrow, model studies, immunophenotyping
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Humans, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, Neoplasm Metastasis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Biomarkers, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.