The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role for G protein-coupled receptor kinase in agonist-specific regulation of μ-opioid receptor responsiveness
Open accessAbstract
The G protein-coupled μ-opioid receptor (μOR) mediates the physiological effects of endogenous opioid peptides as well as the structurally distinct opioid alkaloids morphine and etorphine. An intriguing feature of μOR signaling is the differential receptor trafficking and desensitization properties following activation by distinct agonists, which have been proposed as possible mechanisms related to opioid tolerance. Here we report that the ability of distinct opioid agonists to differentially regulate μOR internalization and desensitization is related to their ability to promote G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-dependent phosphorylation of the μOR. Although both etorphine and morphine effectively activate the μOR, only etorphine elicits robust μOR phosphorylation followed by plasma membrane translocation of β-arrestin and dynamin-dependent receptor internalization. In contrast, corresponding to its inability to cause μOR internalization, morphine is unable to either elicit μOR phosphorylation or stimulate β-arrestin translocation. However, upon the overexpression of GRK2, morphine gains the capacity to induce μOR phosphorylation, accompanied by the rescue of β-arrestin translocation and receptor sequestration. Moreover, overexpression of GRK2 also leads to an attenuation of morphine-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. These findings point to the existence of marked differences in the ability of different opioid agonists to promote μOR phosphorylation by GRK. These differences may provide the molecular basis underlying the different analgesic properties of opioid agonists and contribute to the distinct ability of various opioids to induce drug tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Regulation of μ-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance
Williams, J. T., Ingram, S. L., Henderson, G., Chavkin, C., von Zastrow, M., Schulz, S., Koch, T., Evans, C. J., & Christie, M. J. (2013) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.112.005942 · Cited by 802
Waldhoer, M., Bartlett, S. E., & Whistler, J. L. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073940 · Cited by 740
Claing, A. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(01)00023-5 · Cited by 519
Gillis, A., Gondin, A. B., Kliewer, A., Sanchez, J., Lim, H. D., Alamein, C., Manandhar, P., Santiago, M., Fritzwanker, S., Schmiedel, F., et al. (2020) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaz3140 · Cited by 336
Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: abnormal or normal pain?
Simonnet, G., & Rivat, C. (2003) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200301200-00001 · Cited by 273
Tanowitz, M., & von Zastrow, M. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m304504200 · Cited by 169
Raehal, K. M., & Bohn, L. M. (2014) · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41199-1_22 · Cited by 154
“…interactions between the receptor and G proteins even in the continued presence of agonist resulting in diminished G protein-mediated signaling (Zhang et al. 1998; Whistler and von Zastrow 1998; Kovoor et al. 1997, 1998; Bohn et al. 2000; Lowe et al. 2002; Eisinger et al. 2002; Celver et al.…”
BackgroundSmith, P. A., Selley, D. E., Sim-Selley, L. J., & Welch, S. P. (2007) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.06.001 · Cited by 81
Low Intrinsic Efficacy Alone Cannot Explain the Improved Side Effect Profiles of New Opioid Agonists
Stahl, E. L., & Bohn, L. M. (2022) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00466 · Cited by 55
Vasudevan, L., Vandeputte, M., Deventer, M., Wouters, E., Cannaert, A., & Stove, C. P. (2020) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113910 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Ferguson, S. S. G., Barak, L. S., Bodduluri, S. R., Laporte, S. A., Law, P.-Y., & Caron, M. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-06-09
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7157-7162
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2127424619
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.