The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gene discovery in the wood-forming tissues of poplar: Analysis of 5,692 expressed sequence tags
Open accessAbstract
A rapidly growing area of genome research is the generation of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) in which large numbers of randomly selected cDNA clones are partially sequenced. The collection of ESTs reflects the level and complexity of gene expression in the sampled tissue. To date, the majority of plant ESTs are from nonwoody plants such as Arabidopsis , Brassica , maize, and rice. Here, we present a large-scale production of ESTs from the wood-forming tissues of two poplars, Populus tremula L. × tremuloides Michx. and Populus trichocarpa ‘Trichobel.’ The 5,692 ESTs analyzed represented a total of 3,719 unique transcripts for the two cDNA libraries. Putative functions could be assigned to 2,245 of these transcripts that corresponded to 820 protein functions. Of specific interest to forest biotechnology are the 4% of ESTs involved in various processes of cell wall formation, such as lignin and cellulose synthesis, 5% similar to developmental regulators and members of known signal transduction pathways, and 2% involved in hormone biosynthesis. An additional 12% of the ESTs showed no significant similarity to any other DNA or protein sequences in existing databases. The absence of these sequences from public databases may indicate a specific role for these proteins in wood formation. The cDNA libraries and the accompanying database are valuable resources for forest research directed toward understanding the genetic control of wood formation and future endeavors to modify wood and fiber properties for industrial use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Populus : A Model System for Plant Biology
Jansson, S., & Douglas, C. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103956 · Cited by 645
Populus: Arabidopsis for Forestry. Do We Need a Model Tree?
TAYLOR, G. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf255 · Cited by 441
Purine and Pyrimidine Nucleotide Synthesis and Metabolism
Moffatt, B. A., & Ashihara, H. (2002) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0018 · Cited by 375
Nutritional genomics: Manipulating plant micronutrients to improve human health
DellaPenna, D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5426.375 · Cited by 313
The Xylem and Phloem Transcriptomes from Secondary Tissues of the Arabidopsis Root-Hypocotyl
Zhao, C., Craig, J. C., Petzold, H. E., Dickerman, A. W., & Beers, E. P. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.060202 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Sterky, F., Regan, S., Karlsson, J., Hertzberg, M., Rohde, A., Holmberg, A., Amini, B., Bhalerao, R., Larsson, M., Villarroel, R., Van Montagu, M., Sandberg, G., Olsson, O., Teeri, T. T., Boerjan, W., Gustafsson, P., Uhlén, M., Sundberg, B., & Lundeberg, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-10-27
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 13330-13335
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1999126070
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene discovery in the wood-forming tissues of poplar: Analysis of 5,692 expressed sequence tags. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.95.22.13330
- The paper
- Sterky, F., Regan, S., Karlsson, J., Hertzberg, M., Rohde, A., Holmberg, A., Amini, B., Bhalerao, R., Larsson, M., Villarroel, R., Van Montagu, M., Sandberg, G., Olsson, O., Teeri, T. T., Boerjan, W., Gustafsson, P., Uhlén, M., Sundberg, B., & Lundeberg, J. (1998). Gene discovery in the wood-forming tissues of poplar: Analysis of 5,692 expressed sequence tags. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.22.13330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.