Cited by 362Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome

Open access
Sánchez, Roberto, Sali, Andrej·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The function of a protein generally is determined by its three-dimensional (3D) structure. Thus, it would be useful to know the 3D structure of the thousands of protein sequences that are emerging from the many genome projects. To this end, fold assignment, comparative protein structure modeling, and model evaluation were automated completely. As an illustration, the method was applied to the proteins in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker’s yeast) genome. It resulted in all-atom 3D models for substantial segments of 1,071 (17%) of the yeast proteins, only 40 of which have had their 3D structure determined experimentally. Of the 1,071 modeled yeast proteins, 236 were related clearly to a protein of known structure for the first time; 41 of these previously have not been characterized at all.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13597

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • YNL181w encodes a putative oxidoreductase that localizes to the ER and ynl181w hypomorphic mutants showed altered sensitivities to numerous bioactive compounds.

    “Indeed, YNL181w encodes a putative oxidoreductase that localizes to the ER (27) and, consistent with defective membrane function, ynl181w hypomorphic mutants showed altered sensitivities to numerous bioactive compounds (fig. S18)(8).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez, R., & Sali, A.
Affiliations
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Laboratories of Molecular Biophysics, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-11-10
Volume
95
Issue
23
Pages
13597-13602
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1972436355
Cited by
362
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM54762, R29GM054762, R01GM054762)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein structure prediction, comparative protein structure modeling, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, yeast proteins, model evaluation
MeSH terms
Fungal Proteins, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Genome, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review