The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells
Open accessAbstract
Human pluripotent stem cells would be invaluable for in vitro studies of aspects of human embryogenesis. With the goal of establishing pluripotent stem cell lines, gonadal ridges and mesenteries containing primordial germ cells (PGCs, 5–9 weeks postfertilization) were cultured on mouse STO fibroblast feeder layers in the presence of human recombinant leukemia inhibitory factor, human recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor, and forskolin. Initially, single PGCs in culture were visualized by alkaline phosphatase activity staining. Over a period of 7–21 days, PGCs gave rise to large multicellular colonies resembling those of mouse pluripotent stem cells termed embryonic stem and embryonic germ (EG) cells. Throughout the culture period most cells within the colonies continued to be alkaline phosphatase-positive and tested positive against a panel of five immunological markers (SSEA-1, SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1–60, and TRA-1–81) that have been used routinely to characterize embryonic stem and EG cells. The cultured cells have been continuously passaged and found to be karyotypically normal and stable. Both XX and XY cell cultures have been obtained. Immunohistochemical analysis of embryoid bodies collected from these cultures revealed a wide variety of differentiated cell types, including derivatives of all three embryonic germ layers. Based on their origin and demonstrated properties, these human PGC-derived cultures meet the criteria for pluripotent stem cells and most closely resemble EG cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells
Pittenger, M. F., Mackay, A. M., Beck, S. C., Jaiswal, R. K., Douglas, R., Mosca, J. D., Moorman, M. A., Simonetti, D. W., Craig, S., & Marshak, D. R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.143 · Cited by 21,052
Gage, F. H. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5457.1433 · Cited by 4,786
Multilineage differentiation from human embryonic stem cell lines
Odorico, J. S., Kaufman, D. S., & Thomson, J. A. (2001) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.19-3-193 · Cited by 969
Cardiomyocyte Grafting for Cardiac Repair: Graft Cell Death and Anti-Death Strategies
Zhang, M., Methot, D., Poppa, V., Fujio, Y., Walsh, K., & Murry, C. E. (2001) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1006/jmcc.2001.1367 · Cited by 878
Dynamic stem cell states: Naive to primed pluripotency in rodents and humans
Weinberger, L., Ayyash, M., Novershtern, N., & Hanna, J. H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2015.28 · Cited by 622
Nguyen, T., Watkins, K. E., & Kishore, V. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36668 · Cited by 83
What Can Stem Cell Models Tell Us About Human Germ Cell Biology?
Irie, N., Sybirna, A., & Surani, M. A. (2018) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.02.010 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Shamblott, M. J., Axelman, J., Wang, S., Bugg, E. M., Littlefield, J. W., Donovan, P. J., Blumenthal, P. D., Huggins, G. R., & Gearhart, J. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1998-11-10
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 13726-13731
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2056489392
- Cited by
- 1,420
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.