The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The antioxidant neuroprotective effects of estrogens and phenolic compounds are independent from their estrogenic properties
Open accessAbstract
Among the family of steroidal molecules, only estrogens have the capability of preventing neuronal cell death caused by increased oxidative burden. Employing neuronal cell lines, brain membrane, and low density lipoprotein oxidation assays, we show that the antioxidant and neuroprotective effects of estrogens are dependent not on their genomic properties as hormones but rather on their basic chemical properties as hydrophobic phenolic molecules. Concentrations of 17β-estradiol of 0.1–500 nM, which confer maximum estrogen receptor-dependent gene transcription in vitro as well as maximum estrogen receptor binding, respectively, do not show antioxidant or neuroprotective effects. In contrast, phenolic compounds such as 2,4,6-trimethylphenol, N -acetylserotonin, and 5-hydroxyindole exhibit neuroprotective effects without any estrogenicity. Comparing various natural and synthetic mono- and polyphenolic compounds, no correlation between their antioxidant cytoprotective effect and their estrogenic potency can be seen. These results call into question the idea of a general correlation between the intended pharmacological effects of estrogens and phenolic compounds and their effect on estrogen receptor-dependent pathways. Furthermore, they may open the door toward the rational design of neuroprotective antioxidants with decreased hormonal side effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polyphenols: Chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance
Bravo, L. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01670.x · Cited by 4,030
Gene regulation by steroid hormones
Beato, M. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90237-7 · Cited by 3,383
A Controlled Trial of Selegiline, Alpha-Tocopherol, or Both as Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease
Sano, M., Ernesto, C., Thomas, R. G., Klauber, M. R., Schafer, K., Grundman, M., Woodbury, P., Growdon, J., Cotman, C. W., Pfeiffer, E., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704243361704 · Cited by 2,380
SEROTONIN IN THE REGULATION OF BRAIN MICROCIRCULATION
COHEN, Z., BONVENTO, G., LACOMBE, P., & HAMEL, E. (1996) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(96)00033-0 · Cited by 314
Cited by
Uttara, B., Singh, A., Zamboni, P., & Mahajan, R. (2009) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/157015909787602823 · Cited by 3,378
Interaction between Phenolics and Gut Microbiota: Role in Human Health
Selma, M. V., Espín, J. C., & Tomás-Barberán, F. A. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf902107d · Cited by 1,324
Garcia-Segura, L. M., Azcoitia, I., & DonCarlos, L. L. (2001) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00025-3 · Cited by 938
Borrás, C., Sastre, J., García-Sala, D., Lloret, A., Pallardó, F. V., & Viña, J. (2003) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0891-5849(02)01356-4 · Cited by 654
Neuroprotective effects of estrogens: potential mechanisms of action
Green, P. S., & Simpkins, J. W. (2000) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0736-5748(00)00017-4 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Moosmann, B., & Behl, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-08-03
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 8867-8872
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2165807863
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The antioxidant neuroprotective effects of estrogens and phenolic compounds are independent from their estrogenic properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.16.8867
- The paper
- Moosmann, B., & Behl, C. (1999). The antioxidant neuroprotective effects of estrogens and phenolic compounds are independent from their estrogenic properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.16.8867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.