The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: Evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction
Open accessAbstract
The yeast genome encodes four proteins (Pms1 and Mlh1–3) homologous to the bacterial mismatch repair component, MutL. Using two hybrid-interaction and coimmunoprecipitation studies, we show that these proteins can form only three types of complexes in vivo. Mlh1 is the common component of all three complexes, interacting with Pms1, Mlh2, and Mlh3, presumptively as heterodimers. The phenotypes of single deletion mutants reveal distinct functions for the three heterodimers during meiosis: in a pms1 mutant, frequent postmeiotic segregation indicates a defect in the correction of heteroduplex DNA, whereas the frequency of crossing-over is normal. Conversely, crossing-over in the mlh3 mutant is reduced to ≈70% of wild-type levels but correction of heteroduplex is normal. In a mlh2 mutant, crossing-over is normal and postmeiotic segregation is not observed but non-Mendelian segregation is elevated and altered with respect to parity. Finally, to a first approximation, the mlh1 mutant represents the combined single mutant phenotypes. Taken together, these data imply modulation of a basic Mlh1 function via combination with the three other MutL homologs and suggest specifically that Mlh1 combines with Mlh3 to promote meiotic crossing-over.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair
Marsischky, G. T., Filosi, N., Kane, M. F., & Kolodner, R. (1996) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.10.4.407 · Cited by 581
Cited by
DNA Mismatch Repair: Functions and Mechanisms
Iyer, R. R., Pluciennik, A., Burdett, V., & Modrich, P. L. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0404794 · Cited by 905
DNA MISMATCH REPAIR AND GENETIC INSTABILITY
Harfe, B. D., & Jinks-Robertson, S. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.359 · Cited by 608
Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation
de Vries, F. A. T., de Boer, E., van den Bosch, M., Baarends, W. M., Ooms, M., Yuan, L., Liu, J.-G., van Zeeland, A. A., Heyting, C., & Pastink, A. (2005) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.329705 · Cited by 455
Wei, K., Clark, A. B., Wong, E., Kane, M. F., Mazur, D. J., Parris, T., Kolas, N. K., Russell, R., Hou, H., Kneitz, B., et al. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1060603 · Cited by 329
Cheng, C.-H., Lo, Y.-H., Liang, S.-S., Ti, S.-C., Lin, F.-M., Yeh, C.-H., Huang, H.-Y., & Wang, T.-F. (2006) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1430406 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, T.-F., Kleckner, N., & Hunter, N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-11-23
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 13914-13919
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2008129321
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: Evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.24.13914
- The paper
- Wang, T.-F., Kleckner, N., & Hunter, N. (1999). Functional specificity of MutL homologs in yeast: Evidence for three Mlh1-based heterocomplexes with distinct roles during meiosis in recombination and mismatch correction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.24.13914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.