The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice
Open accessAbstract
Molecular, sequence-based environmental surveys of microorganisms have revealed a large degree of previously uncharacterized diversity. However, nearly all studies of the human endogenous bacterial flora have relied on cultivation and biochemical characterization of the resident organisms. We used molecular methods to characterize the breadth of bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice by comparing 264 small subunit rDNA sequences from 21 clone libraries created with products amplified directly from subgingival plaque, with sequences obtained from bacteria that were cultivated from the same specimen, as well as with sequences available in public databases. The majority (52.5%) of the directly amplified 16S rRNA sequences were <99% identical to sequences within public databases. In contrast, only 21.4% of the sequences recovered from cultivated bacteria showed this degree of variability. The 16S rDNA sequences recovered by direct amplification were also more deeply divergent; 13.5% of the amplified sequences were more than 5% nonidentical to any known sequence, a level of dissimilarity that is often found between members of different genera. None of the cultivated sequences exhibited this degree of sequence dissimilarity. Finally, direct amplification of 16S rDNA yielded a more diverse view of the subgingival bacterial flora than did cultivation. Our data suggest that a significant proportion of the resident human bacterial flora remain poorly characterized, even within this well studied and familiar microbial environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacteriologic analysis of infected dog and cat bites
Talan, D. A., Citron, D. M., Abrahamian, F. M., Moran, G. J., & Goldstein, E. J. C. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901143400202 · Cited by 941
The Agent of Bacillary Angiomatosis: An Approach to the Identification of Uncultured Pathogens
Relman, D. A., Loutit, J. S., Schmidt, T. M., Falkow, S., & Tompkins, L. S. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199012063232301 · Cited by 901
Self-citation
Cited by
Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity
Aas, J. A., Paster, B. J., Stokes, L. N., Olsen, I., & Dewhirst, F. E. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.11.5721-5732.2005 · Cited by 3,092
Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut
Hooper, L. V., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058709 · Cited by 2,362
Periodontitis: a polymicrobial disruption of host homeostasis
Darveau, R. P. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2337 · Cited by 1,688
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Periasamy, S., & Jakubovics, N. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2381 · Cited by 1,309
Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes?
Marsh, P. D. (2003) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.26082-0 · Cited by 1,256
Metadata
- Authors
- Kroes, I., Lepp, P. W., & Relman, D. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-12-07
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 14547-14552
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2022867284
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.25.14547
- The paper
- Kroes, I., Lepp, P. W., & Relman, D. A. (1999). Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.25.14547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.