The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical and chemical unfolding of a single protein: A comparison
Open accessAbstract
Is the mechanical unraveling of protein domains by atomic force microscopy (AFM) just a technological feat or a true measurement of their unfolding? By engineering a protein made of tandem repeats of identical Ig modules, we were able to get explicit AFM data on the unfolding rate of a single protein domain that can be accurately extrapolated to zero force. We compare this with chemical unfolding rates for untethered modules extrapolated to 0 M denaturant. The unfolding rates obtained by the two methods are the same. Furthermore, the transition state for unfolding appears at the same position on the folding pathway when assessed by either method. These results indicate that mechanical unfolding of a single protein by AFM does indeed reflect the same event that is observed in traditional unfolding experiments. The way is now open for the extensive use of AFM to measure folding reactions at the single-molecule level. Single-molecule AFM recordings have the added advantage that they define the reaction coordinate and expose rare unfolding events that cannot be observed in the absence of chemical denaturants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores
Elosegui-Artola, A., Andreu, I., Beedle, A. E. M., Lezamiz, A., Uroz, M., Kosmalska, A. J., Oria, R., Kechagia, J. Z., Rico-Lastres, P., Le Roux, A.-L., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008 · Cited by 1,491
Dynamic force spectroscopy of single DNA molecules
Strunz, T., Oroszlan, K., Schäfer, R., & Güntherodt, H.-J. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.20.11277 · Cited by 580
The present view of the mechanism of protein folding
Daggett, V., & Fersht, A. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1126 · Cited by 398
AFM: a versatile tool in biophysics
Alessandrini, A., & Facci, P. (2005) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/16/6/r01 · Cited by 384
Castanho, M. A. R. B., & Fernandes, M. X. (2006) · European Biophysics Journal · doi:10.1007/s00249-005-0007-9 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrion-Vazquez, M., Oberhauser, A. F., Fowler, S. B., Marszalek, P. E., Broedel, S. E., Clarke, J., & Fernandez, J. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 1999-03-30
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3694-3699
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2037720334
- Cited by
- 1,027
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical and chemical unfolding of a single protein: A comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3694
- The paper
- Carrion-Vazquez, M., Oberhauser, A. F., Fowler, S. B., Marszalek, P. E., Broedel, S. E., Clarke, J., & Fernandez, J. M. (1999). Mechanical and chemical unfolding of a single protein: A comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3694
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.