The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic reconstitution of systemic lupus erythematosus immunopathology with polycongenic murine strains
Open accessAbstract
We previously produced three congenic strains carrying lupus susceptibility genes (Sle1-Sle3) from the lupus-prone NZM2410 mouse on the C57BL/6 background and characterized their component phenotypes.Sle1 mediates the loss of tolerance to nuclear antigens;Sle2 lowers the activation threshold of B cells; and Sle3 mediates a dysregulation of CD4+T cells. We have now created a collection of bi- and tricongenic strains with these intervals and assessed the autoimmune phenotypes they elicit in various combinations. Our results indicate that Sle1 is key for the development of fatal lupus. The combination of Sle1 with Sle2,Sle3, or the BXSB-derived autoimmune accelerating gene yaa results in the development of systemic autoimmunity with variably penetrant severe glomerulonephritis culminating in kidney failure. In contrast, two locus combinations of Sle2,Sle3, and yaa failed to mediate fatal disease. These results indicate that the loss of tolerance to chromatin mediated by Sle1 is essential for disease pathogenesis and identify the pathway occupied by Sle1 as a strategic target for therapeutic intervention in systemic lupus erythematosus. The coexpression of Sle1,Sle2, and Sle3 as a B6-triple congenic results in severe systemic autoimmunity and fully penetrant, fatal glomerulonephritis. These results demonstrate the fulfillment of the genetic equivalent of Koch's postulate, where susceptibility loci in a lupus-prone strain have been identified by a genome scan, isolated and functionally characterized by congenic dissection, and finally shown to mediate full disease expression when recombined in a normal genome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Autoreactive B Cell Responses to RNA-Related Antigens Due to TLR7 Gene Duplication
Pisitkun, P., Deane, J. A., Difilippantonio, M. J., Tarasenko, T., Satterthwaite, A. B., & Bolland, S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1124978 · Cited by 894
Taming lupus-a new understanding of pathogenesis is leading to clinical advances
Liu, Z., & Davidson, A. (2012) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2752 · Cited by 433
Marshak-Rothstein, A., & Rifkin, I. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104514 · Cited by 389
Morel, L., Blenman, K. R., Croker, B. P., & Wakeland, E. K. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.4.1787 · Cited by 317
Self-citationChoi, S.-C., Brown, J., Gong, M., Ge, Y., Zadeh, M., Li, W., Croker, B. P., Michailidis, G., Garrett, T. J., Mohamadzadeh, M., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aax2220 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Morel, L., Croker, B. P., Blenman, K. R., Mohan, C., Huang, G., Gilkeson, G., & Wakeland, E. K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-06-06
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6670-6675
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2149965740
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic reconstitution of systemic lupus erythematosus immunopathology with polycongenic murine strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.12.6670
- The paper
- Morel, L., Croker, B. P., Blenman, K. R., Mohan, C., Huang, G., Gilkeson, G., & Wakeland, E. K. (2000). Genetic reconstitution of systemic lupus erythematosus immunopathology with polycongenic murine strains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.12.6670
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.