The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: Statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations
Open accessAbstract
We present statistical methods for analyzing replicated cDNA microarray expression data and report the results of a controlled experiment. The study was conducted to investigate inherent variability in gene expression data and the extent to which replication in an experiment produces more consistent and reliable findings. We introduce a statistical model to describe the probability that mRNA is contained in the target sample tissue, converted to probe, and ultimately detected on the slide. We also introduce a method to analyze the combined data from all replicates. Of the 288 genes considered in this controlled experiment, 32 would be expected to produce strong hybridization signals because of the known presence of repetitive sequences within them. Results based on individual replicates, however, show that there are 55, 36, and 58 highly expressed genes in replicates 1, 2, and 3, respectively. On the other hand, an analysis by using the combined data from all 3 replicates reveals that only 2 of the 288 genes are incorrectly classified as expressed. Our experiment shows that any single microarray output is subject to substantial variability. By pooling data from replicates, we can provide a more reliable analysis of gene expression data. Therefore, we conclude that designing experiments with replications will greatly reduce misclassification rates. We recommend that at least three replicates be used in designing experiments by using cDNA microarrays, particularly when gene expression data from single specimens are being analyzed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Cited by
Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment
Efron, B., Tibshirani, R., Storey, J. D., & Tusher, V. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382129 · Cited by 1,733
Baldi, P., & Long, A. D. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.509 · Cited by 1,618
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenesis and Molecular Determinants of Virulence
Smith, I. (2003) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.16.3.463-496.2003 · Cited by 1,154
Assessing Gene Significance from cDNA Microarray Expression Data via Mixed Models
Wolfinger, R. D., Gibson, G., Wolfinger, E. D., Bennett, L., Hamadeh, H., Bushel, P., Afshari, C., & Paules, R. S. (2001) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/106652701753307520 · Cited by 1,117
Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays
Churchill, G. A. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1031 · Cited by 1,050
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, M.-L. T., Kuo, F. C., Whitmore, G. A., & Sklar, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-08-29
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 9834-9839
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2065912508
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: Statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.97.18.9834
- The paper
- Lee, M.-L. T., Kuo, F. C., Whitmore, G. A., & Sklar, J. (2000). Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: Statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.18.9834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.