The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heritability of fitness in a wild mammal population
Open accessAbstract
Classical population genetics theory predicts that selection should deplete heritable genetic variance for fitness. We show here that, consistent with this prediction, there was a negative correlation between the heritability of a trait and its association with fitness in a wild population of red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) and there was no evidence of significant heritability of total fitness. However, the decline in heritability was caused, at least in part, by increased levels of residual variance in longevity and, hence, in total fitness: in this population, longevity is known to be heavily influenced by environmental factors. Other life history traits that were not associated with longevity, such as average annual breeding success, had higher heritabilities. Coefficients of additive genetic variance differed markedly between traits, but highly skewed measures, such as male breeding success, generally had greater coefficients of variance than morphometric traits. Finally, there were significant maternal effects in a range of traits, particularly for females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
EVOLUTIONARY QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW?
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1989) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005 · Cited by 686
Cited by
Heritability in the genomics era — concepts and misconceptions
Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G., & Wray, N. R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2322 · Cited by 1,921
Data and Theory Point to Mainly Additive Genetic Variance for Complex Traits
Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000008 · Cited by 1,039
The Fetal Matrix: Evolution, Development and Disease
Gluckman, P., & Hanson, M. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139106955 · Cited by 460
Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: a twin study
Kirk, K. M., Blomberg, S. P., Duffy, D. L., Heath, A. C., Owens, I. P. F., & Martin, N. G. (2001) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01304.x · Cited by 245
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Heritability and genetic constraints of life-history trait evolution in preindustrial humans
Pettay, J. E., Kruuk, L. E. B., Jokela, J., & Lummaa, V. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0406709102 · Cited by 197
Self-citationThe fundamental theorem of natural selection with mutations
Basener, W. F., & Sanford, J. C. (2018) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s00285-017-1190-x · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruuk, L. E. B., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Slate, J., Pemberton, J. M., Brotherstone, S., & Guinness, F. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-01-18
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 698-703
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1983869540
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.